Sandra S. Block
- Ophthalmology top 2%
- Epidemiology
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 10%
- Genetics
- Co-authors
- Yi PangKelly A. FrantzDavid S. FriedmanMegan E. CollinsElizabeth Berry‐KravisDominick M. MainoEdwin H. CookJoanne Wuu
- Topics
- Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (18 papers)Ophthalmology and Visual Health Research (6 papers)Corneal surgery and disorders (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
Sandra S. Block
34 papers receiving 491 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
- Ophthalmology 223
- Epidemiology 202
- Cognitive Neuroscience 149
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 127
- Genetics 112
Countries citing papers authored by Sandra S. Block
This map shows the geographic impact of Sandra S. Block's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sandra S. Block with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sandra S. Block more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sandra S. Block
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sandra S. Block. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sandra S. Block. The network helps show where Sandra S. Block may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sandra S. Block
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sandra S. Block. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sandra S. Block based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sandra S. Block. Sandra S. Block is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 9 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 30 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 11 | |
| 11 | 45 | |
| 12 | 26 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | Results from 2016 National Survey of Children’s Health (NSCH) | 1 |
| 15 | Retrospective Review of Refractive Error in Two Age Groups of Hispanic and African American Children Seen in a Chicago Vision Clinic | 1 |
| 16 | 124 | |
| 17 | Comparison of the Neitz Test of Color Vision to the Ishihara Color Vision tests and the anomaloscopic classification | 4 |
| 18 | 0 | |
| 19 | 13 | |
| 20 | 21 |
About Sandra S. Block
Sandra S. Block is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Epidemiology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 38 papers that have together received 518 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (18 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Health Research (6 papers) and Corneal surgery and disorders (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (223 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (149 citations) and Epidemiology (202 citations). Sandra S. Block has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Yi Pang, Kelly A. Frantz, David S. Friedman, Megan E. Collins, Elizabeth Berry‐Kravis, Dominick M. Maino, Edwin H. Cook, Joanne Wuu, Jeff Salt and Michael X. Repka. Their work appears in journals such as Ophthalmology, American Journal of Ophthalmology and Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.