Sandra Mendes

990 total citations
12 papers, 758 citations indexed

About

Sandra Mendes is a scholar working on Cell Biology, Biomedical Engineering and Genetics. According to data from OpenAlex, Sandra Mendes has authored 12 papers receiving a total of 758 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Cell Biology, 4 papers in Biomedical Engineering and 3 papers in Genetics. Recurrent topics in Sandra Mendes's work include Bone Tissue Engineering Materials (4 papers), Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications (4 papers) and Mesenchymal stem cell research (3 papers). Sandra Mendes is often cited by papers focused on Bone Tissue Engineering Materials (4 papers), Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications (4 papers) and Mesenchymal stem cell research (3 papers). Sandra Mendes collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and Portugal. Sandra Mendes's co-authors include Elaine Dzierzak, Catherine Robin, Rui L. Reis, A. M. Cunha, Clemens van Blitterswijk, Y BOVELL, Joost D. de Bruijn, M. Bevis, Joost DeBruijn and Jan Feijén and has published in prestigious journals such as Biomaterials, Development and Journal of Colloid and Interface Science.

In The Last Decade

Sandra Mendes

11 papers receiving 726 citations

Peers

Sandra Mendes
Bill Tawil United States
Heather Doviak United States
K Stewart United Kingdom
Liesbeth Brouwer Netherlands
Han Na Yang South Korea
Deborah J. Heath United Kingdom
Yuxin Sun China
Bill Tawil United States
Sandra Mendes
Citations per year, relative to Sandra Mendes Sandra Mendes (= 1×) peers Bill Tawil

Countries citing papers authored by Sandra Mendes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sandra Mendes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sandra Mendes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sandra Mendes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sandra Mendes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sandra Mendes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sandra Mendes. The network helps show where Sandra Mendes may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sandra Mendes

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sandra Mendes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sandra Mendes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sandra Mendes. Sandra Mendes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
1.
Kaimakis, Polynikis, et al.. (2017). In Vitro Differentiation of Gata2 and Ly6a Reporter Embryonic Stem Cells Corresponds to In Vivo Waves of Hematopoietic Cell Generation. Stem Cell Reports. 10(1). 151–165. 6 indexed citations
2.
Bernardo, María, Sandra Mendes, Nuno Lapa, et al.. (2013). Removal of lead (Pb2+) from aqueous medium by using chars from co-pyrolysis. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 409. 158–165. 43 indexed citations
3.
Prignon, Aurélie, Luc Brans, Sandra Mendes, et al.. (2011). Novel DOTA-Neurotensin Analogues for 111In Scintigraphy and 68Ga PET Imaging of Neurotensin Receptor-Positive Tumors. Bioconjugate Chemistry. 22(7). 1374–1385. 47 indexed citations
4.
Robin, Catherine, Karine Bollérot, Sandra Mendes, et al.. (2009). Human Placenta Is a Potent Hematopoietic Niche Containing Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cells throughout Development. Cell stem cell. 5(4). 385–395. 155 indexed citations
5.
Medvinsky, Alexander, Samir Taoudi, Sandra Mendes, & Elaine Dzierzak. (2008). Analysis and Manipulation of Hematopoietic Progenitor and Stem Cells from Murine Embryonic Tissues. Current Protocols in Stem Cell Biology. 4(1). Unit 2A.6–Unit 2A.6. 25 indexed citations
6.
Mendes, Sandra, Catherine Robin, & Elaine Dzierzak. (2005). Mesenchymal progenitor cells localize within hematopoietic sites throughout ontogeny. Development. 132(5). 1127–1136. 129 indexed citations
7.
Claase, M.B., Dirk W. Grijpma, Sandra Mendes, Joost D. de Bruijn, & Jan Feijén. (2002). Porous PEOT/PBT scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: Preparation, characterization, and in vitro bone marrow cell culturing. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A. 64A(2). 291–300. 50 indexed citations
8.
Mendes, Sandra. (2002). Cultured bone on biomaterial substrates: A tissue engineering approach to treat bone defects. University of Twente Research Information. 1 indexed citations
9.
Mendes, Sandra, Rui L. Reis, Y BOVELL, et al.. (2001). Biocompatibility testing of novel starch-based materials with potential application in orthopaedic surgery: a preliminary study. Biomaterials. 22(14). 2057–2064. 135 indexed citations
10.
DeBruijn, Joost, et al.. (1999). Bone Induction by Implants Coated with Cultured Osteogenic Bone Marrow Cells. Advances in Dental Research. 13(1). 74–81. 76 indexed citations
11.
Reis, Rui L., Sandra Mendes, A. M. Cunha, & M. Bevis. (1997). Processing and in vitro Degradation of Starch/EVOH Thermoplastic Blends. Polymer International. 43(4). 347–352. 5 indexed citations
12.
Reis, Rui L., Sandra Mendes, A. M. Cunha, & M. Bevis. (1997). Processing andin vitro Degradation of Starch/EVOH Thermoplastic Blends. Polymer International. 43(4). 347–352. 86 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026