Liesbeth Brouwer

15 papers receiving 942 citations

Peers

Liesbeth Brouwer
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Biomaterials 457
  • Process Chemistry and Technology 56
  • Molecular Medicine 97
  • Pharmaceutical Science 64
  • Urology 67
Replace Zhiyong Li with:
Zhiyong Li China
Fang Yu United States
Kazutoshi Nozaki Japan
Bei Qian China
Delara Motlagh United States
M. V. Kayser United Kingdom
Mohamed Attawia United States
Derek J. Mortisen United States
Patrick Ginty United Kingdom
Liesbeth Brouwer relative to Zhiyong Li China Zhiyong Li's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.7×
Zhiyong Li · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Liesbeth Brouwer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Liesbeth Brouwer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Liesbeth Brouwer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Liesbeth Brouwer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Liesbeth Brouwer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Liesbeth Brouwer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Liesbeth Brouwer. The network helps show where Liesbeth Brouwer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Liesbeth Brouwer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Liesbeth Brouwer Line = papers co-authored together Liesbeth Brouwer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2003220
2 2002172
3 2000124
4 2000121
5 201582
6 200162
7 199456
8 200742
9
Long-term drug survival and clinical effectiveness of etanercept treatment in patients with ankylosing spondylitis in daily clinical practice.
201725
10 200725
11 200317
12 200110
13 20118
14
Models of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antigen-associated systemic vasculitis and their clinical relevance.
19981
15 20001

About Liesbeth Brouwer

Liesbeth Brouwer is a scholar working on Biomaterials, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Biomedical Engineering, Genetics and Molecular Medicine, having authored 15 papers that have together received 966 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications (4 papers), 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (3 papers), Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications (3 papers), Connective tissue disorders research (2 papers), Mesenchymal stem cell research (2 papers), Vasculitis and related conditions (2 papers), Proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans research (2 papers) and Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biomaterials (457 citations), Process Chemistry and Technology (56 citations), Molecular Medicine (97 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (64 citations) and Urology (67 citations). Liesbeth Brouwer has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Ireland and Pakistan. Frequent co-authors include Marja J.A. van Luyn, P. B. van Wachem, Jeroen Pieper, Toin H. Van Kuppevelt, J.H. Veerkamp, Theo Hafmans, J. Feijen, A.A. Poot, Dirk W. Grijpma and Ana Paula Pêgo. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, Biomaterials, Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, Clinical & Experimental Immunology and Cytokine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact