Sandra Amado

1.4k total citations
30 papers, 656 citations indexed

About

Sandra Amado is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Surgery and Biomedical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Sandra Amado has authored 30 papers receiving a total of 656 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, 11 papers in Surgery and 9 papers in Biomedical Engineering. Recurrent topics in Sandra Amado's work include Nerve injury and regeneration (14 papers), Wound Healing and Treatments (5 papers) and Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (5 papers). Sandra Amado is often cited by papers focused on Nerve injury and regeneration (14 papers), Wound Healing and Treatments (5 papers) and Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (5 papers). Sandra Amado collaborates with scholars based in Portugal, Italy and United States. Sandra Amado's co-authors include Ana Colette Maurício, António Veloso, Paulo Armada-da-Silva, Ana Lúcia Luís, Stefano Geuna, Artur S.P. Varejão, José D. Santos, Stefania Raimondo, Federica Fregnan and Maria José Simões and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Biomaterials and International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.

In The Last Decade

Sandra Amado

30 papers receiving 651 citations

Peers

Sandra Amado
Sandra Amado
Citations per year, relative to Sandra Amado Sandra Amado (= 1×) peers Paulo Armada-da-Silva

Countries citing papers authored by Sandra Amado

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sandra Amado's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sandra Amado with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sandra Amado more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sandra Amado

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sandra Amado. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sandra Amado. The network helps show where Sandra Amado may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sandra Amado

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sandra Amado. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sandra Amado based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sandra Amado. Sandra Amado is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Domingos, Marco, et al.. (2025). Toward Integrative Biomechanical Models of Osteochondral Tissues: A Multilayered Perspective. Bioengineering. 12(6). 649–649. 1 indexed citations
2.
Amado, Sandra, Rui Alvites, Ana Colette Maurício, et al.. (2024). Biomechanical gait analysis in sheep: kinematic parameters. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology. 12. 1370101–1370101. 3 indexed citations
3.
Datta, Abhishek, et al.. (2022). Numerical modelling of a bioreator design targeting optimal conditions for cell culture. AIP conference proceedings. 2425. 220003–220003. 1 indexed citations
4.
Silva, João C., Abhishek Datta, Frederico Castelo Ferreira, et al.. (2020). A Multimodal Stimulation Cell Culture Bioreactor for Tissue Engineering: A Numerical Modelling Approach. Polymers. 12(4). 940–940. 20 indexed citations
5.
Schiariti, Verónica, et al.. (2018). Implementation of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) Core Sets for Children and Youth with Cerebral Palsy: Global Initiatives Promoting Optimal Functioning. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 15(9). 1899–1899. 51 indexed citations
6.
Marinho, Daniel A., et al.. (2017). KINEMATIC ANALYSIS OF KETTLEBELL SWING IN DIFFERENT SURFACES – COMPARISION BETWEEN STABLE AND UNSTABLE SURFACES. ISBS Proceedings Archive. 35(1). 187. 2 indexed citations
7.
Ribeiro, Jorge, Ana Rita Caseiro, Tiago Pereira, et al.. (2017). Evaluation of PVA biodegradable electric conductive membranes for nerve regeneration in axonotmesis injuries: the rat sciatic nerve animal model. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A. 105(5). 1267–1280. 19 indexed citations
8.
Amado, Sandra, et al.. (2015). Trichobezoar – A Rare Cause of Abdominal Mass and Gastric Outlet Obstruction. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 23(1). 50–53. 13 indexed citations
9.
Pereira, Tiago, Paulo Armada-da-Silva, Sandra Amado, et al.. (2014). Effects of umbilical cord tissue mesenchymal stem cells (UCX®) on rat sciatic nerve regeneration after neurotmesis injuries. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 10(1). 14–26. 32 indexed citations
10.
Pereira, Tiago, Andrea Gärtner, Irina Amorim, et al.. (2014). Promoting Nerve Regeneration in a Neurotmesis Rat Model Using Poly(DL-lactide-ε-caprolactone) Membranes and Mesenchymal Stem Cells from the Wharton’s Jelly:In VitroandIn VivoAnalysis. BioMed Research International. 2014. 1–17. 28 indexed citations
11.
Armada-da-Silva, Paulo, et al.. (2013). Role of Physical Exercise for Improving Posttraumatic Nerve Regeneration. International review of neurobiology. 109. 125–149. 30 indexed citations
12.
Amado, Sandra, Paulo Armada-da-Silva, Ana Colette Maurício, et al.. (2011). The sensitivity of two-dimensional hindlimb joint kinematics analysis in assessing functional recovery in rats after sciatic nerve crush. Behavioural Brain Research. 225(2). 562–573. 18 indexed citations
13.
Amado, Sandra, et al.. (2011). Anatomical reference frame versus planar analysis: implications for the kinematics of the rat hindlimb during locomotion. Reviews in the Neurosciences. 22(2). 241–241. 4 indexed citations
14.
Simões, Maria José, Sandra Amado, Andrea Gärtner, et al.. (2010). Use of chitosan scaffolds for repairing rat sciatic nerve defects. Italian Journal of Anatomy and Embryology. 115(3). 190–210. 16 indexed citations
15.
Amado, Sandra, Jorge Rodrigues, Ana Lúcia Luís, et al.. (2010). Effects of collagen membranes enriched with in vitro-differentiated N1E-115 cells on rat sciatic nerve regeneration after end-to-end repair. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation. 7(1). 7–7. 33 indexed citations
16.
Luís, Ana Lúcia, Jorge Rodrigues, Stefano Geuna, et al.. (2008). Neural cell transplantation effects on sciatic nerve regeneration after a standardized crush injury in the rat. Microsurgery. 28(6). 458–470. 28 indexed citations
17.
Luís, Ana Lúcia, Jorge Rodrigues, Stefano Geuna, et al.. (2008). Use of PLGA 90:10 Scaffolds Enriched with In Vitro –Differentiated Neural Cells for Repairing Rat Sciatic Nerve Defects. Tissue Engineering Part A. 14(6). 979–993. 36 indexed citations
18.
Amado, Sandra, Maria José Simões, Paulo Armada-da-Silva, et al.. (2008). Use of hybrid chitosan membranes and N1E-115 cells for promoting nerve regeneration in an axonotmesis rat model. Biomaterials. 29(33). 4409–4419. 89 indexed citations
19.
Luís, Ana Lúcia, Sandra Amado, Stefano Geuna, et al.. (2007). Long-term functional and morphological assessment of a standardized rat sciatic nerve crush injury with a non-serrated clamp. Journal of Neuroscience Methods. 163(1). 92–104. 95 indexed citations
20.
Luís, Ana Lúcia, Jorge Rodrigues, Sandra Amado, et al.. (2007). PLGA 90/10 and caprolactone biodegradable nerve guides for the reconstruction of the rat sciatic nerve. Microsurgery. 27(2). 125–137. 59 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026