Sander Schouws

1.5k total citations
8 papers, 134 citations indexed

About

Sander Schouws is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation and Nuclear and High Energy Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, Sander Schouws has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 134 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 1 paper in Instrumentation and 1 paper in Nuclear and High Energy Physics. Recurrent topics in Sander Schouws's work include Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (7 papers), Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (6 papers) and Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (4 papers). Sander Schouws is often cited by papers focused on Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (7 papers), Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (6 papers) and Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (4 papers). Sander Schouws collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and United States. Sander Schouws's co-authors include Renske Smit, R. J. Bouwens, Jacqueline Hodge, Leindert Boogaard, Mauro Stefanon, P. van der Werf, Stefano Carniani, R. Maiolino, Jinyi Yang and Xiaohui Fan and has published in prestigious journals such as The Astrophysical Journal and Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

In The Last Decade

Sander Schouws

7 papers receiving 115 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Sander Schouws Netherlands	6	123	47	21	4	3	8	134
Ryo Nagino Japan	6	111 0.9×	41 0.9×	14 0.7×	6 1.5×		10	117
Charlotte Simmonds United Kingdom	8	112 0.9×	33 0.7×	11 0.5×	3 0.8×		15	128
Manuel Solimano Chile	6	78 0.6×	17 0.4×	24 1.1×	3 0.8×		11	82
J. Wolf Germany	7	106 0.9×	34 0.7×	22 1.0×	2 0.5×	1 0.3×	11	117
M. Adamczyk Poland	8	134 1.1×	84 1.8×	16 0.8×	7 1.8×		14	148
A. Bignamini Italy	3	128 1.0×	47 1.0×	27 1.3×			5	131
Connor Hayden-Pawson United Kingdom	3	112 0.9×	39 0.8×	9 0.4×	2 0.5×	1 0.3×	3	116
A. M. J. Mortier United Kingdom	3	91 0.7×	43 0.9×	14 0.7×			3	94
Kayla A. Owens United States	7	126 1.0×	34 0.7×	17 0.8×			15	138
Fangxia An China	5	115 0.9×	51 1.1×	36 1.7×			14	127

Countries citing papers authored by Sander Schouws

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sander Schouws's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sander Schouws with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sander Schouws more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sander Schouws

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sander Schouws. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sander Schouws. The network helps show where Sander Schouws may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sander Schouws

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sander Schouws. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sander Schouws based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sander Schouws. Sander Schouws is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Sommovigo, Laura, et al.. (2026). REBELS–MOSFIRE: Weak C III ] Emission Is Typical among Extremely UV-bright, Massive Galaxies at z ∼ 7. The Astrophysical Journal. 999(1). 95–95.

2.

Schouws, Sander, R. J. Bouwens, Katherine Ormerod, et al.. (2025). Detection of [O iii]_{88 μm} in JADES-GS-z14-0 at z = 14.1793. The Astrophysical Journal. 988(1). 19–19. 8 indexed citations

3.

Schouws, Sander, R. J. Bouwens, Renske Smit, et al.. (2023). ALMA as a Redshift Machine: Using [C ii] to Efficiently Confirm Galaxies in the Epoch of Reionization. The Astrophysical Journal. 954(1). 103–103. 7 indexed citations

4.

Endsley, Ryan, Daniel P. Stark, Jianwei Lyu, et al.. (2023). ALMA confirmation of an obscured hyperluminous radio-loud AGN at z = 6.853 associated with a dusty starburst in the 1.5 deg2 COSMOS field. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 520(3). 4609–4620. 23 indexed citations

5.

Schouws, Sander, Mauro Stefanon, R. J. Bouwens, et al.. (2022). Significant Dust-obscured Star Formation in Luminous Lyman-break Galaxies at z ∼ 7–8. The Astrophysical Journal. 928(1). 31–31. 33 indexed citations

6.

Molyneux, Stephen, Renske Smit, D. Schaerer, et al.. (2022). Spectroscopic confirmation of a gravitationally lensed Lyman-break galaxy at z[C ii] = 6.827 using NOEMA. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 512(1). 535–543. 5 indexed citations

7.

Witstok, Joris, Renske Smit, R. Maiolino, et al.. (2022). Dual constraints with ALMA: new [O iii] 88-μm and dust-continuum observations reveal the ISM conditions of luminous LBGs at z ∼ 7. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 515(2). 1751–1773. 41 indexed citations

8.

Endsley, Ryan, Daniel P. Stark, Xiaohui Fan, et al.. (2022). Radio and far-IR emission associated with a massive star-forming galaxy candidate atz≃ 6.8: a radio-loud AGN in the reionization era?. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 512(3). 4248–4261. 17 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact