Samuel L. Drew
Impact in
- Organic Chemistry top 10%
- Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods
- Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis
- Chemical synthesis and alkaloids
- Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods
- Oxidative Organic Chemistry Reactions
-
- Marine Sponges and Natural Products
Papers in
-
- Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods 5
- Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis 2
- Chemical synthesis and alkaloids 1
-
- Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis 3
- Co-authors
- Andrew L. Lawrence (6 shared papers)Michael S. Sherburn (4 shared papers)Christopher G. Newton (1 shared paper)Anthony C. Willis (1 shared paper)Michael N. Paddon‐Row (1 shared paper)Gary S. Nichol (2 shared papers)Fernanda Duarte (2 shared papers)Joel W. Beatty (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Angewandte Chemie International Edition (2 papers)Organic Process Research & Development (1 paper)Chemical Science (1 paper)Cancer Research (1 paper)Nature Chemistry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Samuel L. Drew
8 papers receiving 215 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 29
- Organic Chemistry 186
- Biotechnology 42
- Biochemistry 29
- Pharmacology 19
- Pharmacology 33
Countries citing papers authored by Samuel L. Drew
This map shows the geographic impact of Samuel L. Drew's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Samuel L. Drew with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Samuel L. Drew more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Samuel L. Drew
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Samuel L. Drew. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Samuel L. Drew. The network helps show where Samuel L. Drew may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 23 scholars most cited alongside Samuel L. Drew, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2014 | 73 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 66 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 38 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 23 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 14 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 4 | |
| 7 | 2025 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 1 |
About Samuel L. Drew
Samuel L. Drew is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Pharmacology, Biotechnology, Biochemistry and Oncology, having authored 8 papers that have together received 221 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (5 papers), Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae (3 papers), Marine Sponges and Natural Products (3 papers), Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (3 papers), Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis (2 papers), Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways (1 paper), Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis (1 paper) and Chemical synthesis and alkaloids (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Organic Chemistry (186 citations), Biotechnology (42 citations), Biochemistry (29 citations), Pharmacology (19 citations) and Pharmacology (33 citations). Samuel L. Drew has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Andrew L. Lawrence, Michael S. Sherburn, Christopher G. Newton, Anthony C. Willis, Michael N. Paddon‐Row, Gary S. Nichol, Fernanda Duarte, Joel W. Beatty, Matthew J. Walters and Manmohan R. Leleti. Their work appears in journals such as Angewandte Chemie International Edition, Organic Process Research & Development, Chemical Science, Cancer Research and Nature Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.