Samantha Day

1.2k total citations · 1 hit paper
8 papers, 850 citations indexed

About

Samantha Day is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Philosophy and Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Samantha Day has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 850 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health, 3 papers in Philosophy and 2 papers in Health. Recurrent topics in Samantha Day's work include Mental Health and Psychiatry (3 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (3 papers) and Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (2 papers). Samantha Day is often cited by papers focused on Mental Health and Psychiatry (3 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (3 papers) and Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (2 papers). Samantha Day collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Myanmar. Samantha Day's co-authors include Emmanuelle Peters, Stephen Joseph, Philippa Garety, Stuart Linke, Anthony S. David, Alan D. Pickering, Anthony Glasper, Andrew Kent, Elena Hamann and M. Inam Jameel and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Abnormal Psychology, Personality and Individual Differences and Schizophrenia Bulletin.

In The Last Decade

Samantha Day

8 papers receiving 819 citations

Hit Papers

Measuring Delusional Ideation: The 21-Item Peters et al. ... 2004 2026 2011 2018 2004 100 200 300 400

Peers

Samantha Day
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 501
  • Philosophy 294
  • Clinical Psychology 251
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 205
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 177
Replace Katherine Pugh with:
Katherine Pugh United Kingdom
Herman N. Sno Netherlands
Jennifer R. Fanning United States
Kathlen Priebe Germany
Anneli Sorri Finland
Antoinette Prouteau France
Deana S. Benishay United States
Ronald C. Simons United States
Rebecca Seligman United States
Robert J. Barrett Australia
Katherine Pugh United Kingdom View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Samantha Day
Samantha Day · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Samantha Day
Samantha Day · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Samantha Day

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Samantha Day's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Samantha Day with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Samantha Day more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Samantha Day

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Samantha Day. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Samantha Day. The network helps show where Samantha Day may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Samantha Day

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Samantha Day. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Samantha Day based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Samantha Day. Samantha Day is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 54
2
Trancing Rabbits: Relaxed hypnosis or a state of fear?
8
3
Measuring Delusional Ideation: The 21-Item Peters et al. Delusions Inventory (PDI) breakdown →
449
4 36
5 65
6 172
7 48
8
The incidence of delusional ideation in religious and psychotic populations
18

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026