Sam Stanier

1.8k total citations · 1 hit paper
55 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

Sam Stanier is a scholar working on Civil and Structural Engineering, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and Ocean Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Sam Stanier has authored 55 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 52 papers in Civil and Structural Engineering, 8 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and 7 papers in Ocean Engineering. Recurrent topics in Sam Stanier's work include Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics (44 papers), Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures (32 papers) and Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization (21 papers). Sam Stanier is often cited by papers focused on Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics (44 papers), Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures (32 papers) and Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization (21 papers). Sam Stanier collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and South Sudan. Sam Stanier's co-authors include David White, Mark Cassidy, W. Andy Take, Justin A. Blaber, Pan Hu, Dong Wang, Britta Bienen, Conleth O’Loughlin, J.A. Black and C. C. Hird and has published in prestigious journals such as Géotechnique, Engineering Geology and Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering.

In The Last Decade

Sam Stanier

54 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Hit Papers

Improved image-based defo... 2015 2026 2018 2022 2015 100 200 300

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Sam Stanier 1.2k 209 186 116 114 55 1.3k
Michele Jamiolkowski 2.3k 1.9× 384 1.8× 259 1.4× 161 1.4× 185 1.6× 99 2.4k
Wei-Qiang Feng 882 0.7× 231 1.1× 206 1.1× 51 0.4× 128 1.1× 72 1.1k
Junichi Koseki 2.4k 2.0× 388 1.9× 373 2.0× 82 0.7× 200 1.8× 164 2.6k
Fabrice Emeriault 1.1k 0.9× 594 2.8× 124 0.7× 128 1.1× 234 2.1× 65 1.2k
Hans Petter Jostad 969 0.8× 209 1.0× 261 1.4× 131 1.1× 103 0.9× 51 1.2k
Jian‐Min Zhang 1.6k 1.4× 436 2.1× 378 2.0× 81 0.7× 129 1.1× 91 1.8k
Dayong Li 1.2k 1.0× 294 1.4× 119 0.6× 83 0.7× 147 1.3× 98 1.4k
Pierre Breul 664 0.6× 290 1.4× 192 1.0× 70 0.6× 167 1.5× 85 857
Zhengshou Lai 372 0.3× 129 0.6× 144 0.8× 251 2.2× 216 1.9× 38 718
Zhuang Cheng 514 0.4× 45 0.2× 323 1.7× 152 1.3× 207 1.8× 29 710

Countries citing papers authored by Sam Stanier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sam Stanier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sam Stanier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sam Stanier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sam Stanier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sam Stanier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sam Stanier. The network helps show where Sam Stanier may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sam Stanier

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sam Stanier. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sam Stanier based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sam Stanier. Sam Stanier is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Almeida, Márcio de Souza Soares de, et al.. (2022). Centrifuge Modeling of the Seismic Behavior of Soft Clay Slopes. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering. 148(11). 10 indexed citations
2.
Stanier, Sam, et al.. (2022). Calibration of strain-softening constitutive model parameters from full-field deformation measurements. Canadian Geotechnical Journal. 60(6). 817–833. 6 indexed citations
3.
Stanier, Sam, et al.. (2022). A viscoplastic recoverable sensitivity model for fine-grained soils. Computers and Geotechnics. 147. 104725–104725. 5 indexed citations
4.
Stanier, Sam, et al.. (2022). Characterisation of interface friction strain-rate dependency of soft sediments at low stresses using a ring penetrometer. Géotechnique. 74(11). 1095–1110. 2 indexed citations
5.
Madabhushi, Spg, et al.. (2021). Seismic Centrifuge Modeling of a Gentle Slope of Layered Clay, Including a Weak Layer. Geotechnical Testing Journal. 45(1). 125–144. 4 indexed citations
6.
Haigh, Stuart K., et al.. (2020). Low‐cost digital image correlation and strain measurement for geotechnical applications. Strain. 56(6). 18 indexed citations
7.
Hu, Pan, et al.. (2020). Breakout force required for jack-up spudcan extraction from sand-over-clay seabeds. SOILS AND FOUNDATIONS. 60(2). 413–424. 1 indexed citations
8.
Stanier, Sam, et al.. (2019). Shallow penetrometer tests: theoretical and experimental modelling of penetration and dissipation stages. Canadian Geotechnical Journal. 57(4). 568–579. 7 indexed citations
9.
O’Loughlin, Conleth, et al.. (2018). A Simple Approach to Multi-Degree-of-Freedom Loading in a Geotechnical Centrifuge. Geotechnical Testing Journal. 42(5). 1150–1168. 1 indexed citations
10.
Ullah, Shah Neyamat, Yuxia Hu, Sam Stanier, & David White. (2016). Lateral boundary effects in centrifuge foundation tests. International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics. 17(3). 144–160. 29 indexed citations
11.
Hu, Pan, et al.. (2015). A comparison of full profile prediction methods for a spudcan penetrating sand overlying clay. Géotechnique Letters. 5(3). 131–139. 15 indexed citations
12.
Stanier, Sam, Jelke Dijkstra, Danuta Leśniewska, et al.. (2015). Vermiculate artefacts in image analysis of granular materials. Computers and Geotechnics. 72. 100–113. 54 indexed citations
13.
Hambleton, James P., et al.. (2014). Analysis of installation forces for helical piles in clay. UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA). 8 indexed citations
14.
Hambleton, James P., Sam Stanier, David White, & Scott W. Sloan. (2014). Modelling ploughing and cutting processes in soils. UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA). 49(4). 147–156. 2 indexed citations
15.
Hu, Pan, Dong Wang, Mark Cassidy, & Sam Stanier. (2014). Predicting the resistance profile of a spudcan penetrating sand overlying clay. Canadian Geotechnical Journal. 51(10). 1151–1164. 97 indexed citations
16.
Stanier, Sam, et al.. (2014). Observing the effects of sustained loading on spudcan footings in clay. Géotechnique. 64(11). 918–926. 21 indexed citations
17.
Ullah, Shah Neyamat, Yuxia Hu, David White, & Sam Stanier. (2014). Lateral Boundary Effect in Centrifuge Tests for Spudcan Penetration in Uniform Clay. Applied Mechanics and Materials. 553. 458–463. 9 indexed citations
18.
Ullah, Shah Neyamat, Yuxia Hu, David White, & Sam Stanier. (2014). LDFE study of bottom boundary effect in foundation model tests. International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics. 14(3). 80–87. 9 indexed citations
19.
Stanier, Sam & Alessandro Tarantino. (2013). An approach for predicting the stability of vertical cuts in cohesionless soils above the water table. Engineering Geology. 158. 98–108. 16 indexed citations
20.
Stanier, Sam, J.A. Black, & C. C. Hird. (2012). Enhancing accuracy and precision of transparent synthetic soil modelling. International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics. 12(4). 162–175. 30 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026