Citations per year, relative to Saly N. Thomas Saly N. Thomas (= 1×)
peers
Samuel Roch
Countries citing papers authored by Saly N. Thomas
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Saly N. Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Saly N. Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Saly N. Thomas more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Saly N. Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Saly N. Thomas. The network helps show where Saly N. Thomas may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Saly N. Thomas
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Saly N. Thomas.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Saly N. Thomas based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Saly N. Thomas. Saly N. Thomas is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Dar, Shabir Ahmad, Saly N. Thomas, S. K. Chakraborty, & A. K. Jaiswar. (2014). Length-weight relationships for five species of Clupeidae caught from Mumbai coast, India. Fishery Technology. 51(4).5 indexed citations
8.
Thomas, Saly N., et al.. (2014). Longline Fishing for High Value Species off Southern India with Special Reference to Structural and Operational Changes. Fishery Technology. 51(2).2 indexed citations
9.
Thomas, Saly N., et al.. (2012). Trawl Codend Selectivity in respect of Silver Pomfret Pampus argenteus (Euphrasen, 1788). Fishery Technology. 49(1). 14–17.2 indexed citations
10.
Thomas, Saly N., et al.. (2010). Corrosion Resistance of Fishing Hooks with Different Surface Coatings. Fishery Technology. 47(2).2 indexed citations
11.
Thomas, Saly N., et al.. (2009). Design and General Characteristics of Gill Nets of Assam. Fishery Technology. 46(2).
12.
Thomas, Saly N., et al.. (2008). Size selection of metapenaeus dobsoni (miers) in stake net codends used in Cochin backwaters. Fishery Technology. 45(2).3 indexed citations
13.
Velayudhan, T S, et al.. (2007). Mariculture of mussels in India. Eprints@CMFRI Open Access Institutional Repository (Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute).1 indexed citations
14.
Thomas, Saly N., et al.. (2007). Fishing Hooks: A Review. Fishery Technology. 44(1).7 indexed citations
15.
Ashraf, P. Muhamed, B. Meenakumari, & Saly N. Thomas. (2007). Seasonal variation of metal concentration in barnacle (Balanus sp.) of Cochin estuary, south west coast of India. Fishery Technology. 44(1).2 indexed citations
16.
Thomas, Saly N., et al.. (2006). Design and General Characteristics of Marine Gill Nets of Kerala. Fishery Technology. 43(1).7 indexed citations
17.
Thomas, Saly N., et al.. (2005). Utilization of rubber wood for fishing canoe construction. Fishery Technology. 42(1).1 indexed citations
18.
Thomas, Saly N., et al.. (2003). Catch analysis in small mesh gill nets. Indian Journal of Fisheries. 50(3). 387–393.3 indexed citations
19.
Thomas, Saly N., et al.. (2002). Substitution of Polyamide Multifilament by Polyethylene Twisted Monofilament in Large Mesh Gill Nets. Fishery Technology. 39(2).1 indexed citations
20.
Thomas, Saly N., et al.. (2000). Effect of Creosote and Copper-Chrome-Arsenic (CCA) Treatments on the Compressive Strength of Haldu Wood (Adina cordifolia Benth & Hook). Fishery Technology. 37(1).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.