S. W. Field
Impact in
- Geophysics top 5%
- Geological and Geochemical Analysis
- High-pressure geophysics and materials
- earthquake and tectonic studies
- Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 10%
- Astro and Planetary Science
- Planetary Science and Exploration
Papers in
-
- Geological and Geochemical Analysis 5
- High-pressure geophysics and materials 5
- earthquake and tectonic studies 4
- Geological and Tectonic Studies in Latin America 1
-
- Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis 1
- Co-authors
- Stephen E. Haggerty (4 shared papers)V. Sautter (1 shared paper)Marilyn M. Lindstrom (1 shared paper)David W. Mittlefehldt (1 shared paper)D. D. Bogard (1 shared paper)D. H. Garrison (1 shared paper)F. R. Boyd (1 shared paper)Jill Dill Pasteris (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology (2 papers)Science (1 paper)American Mineralogist (1 paper)Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta (1 paper)Metic (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSouth AfricaRussia
In The Last Decade
S. W. Field
6 papers receiving 324 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 29
- Geophysics 297
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 99
- Geochemistry and Petrology 15
- Paleontology 11
- Geology 5
Countries citing papers authored by S. W. Field
This map shows the geographic impact of S. W. Field's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S. W. Field with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S. W. Field more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by S. W. Field
This network shows the impact of papers produced by S. W. Field. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S. W. Field. The network helps show where S. W. Field may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 14 scholars most cited alongside S. W. Field, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1994 | 96 | |
| 2 | 1991 | 96 | |
| 3 | 1996 | 95 | |
| 4 | 1994 | 34 | |
| 5 | 2008 | 13 | |
| 6 | Petrology and Geochemistry of Acapulco- and Lodran-like Achondrites | 1993 | 3 |
| 7 | 2019 | 0 |
About S. W. Field
S. W. Field is a scholar working on Geophysics, Mechanics of Materials, Artificial Intelligence, Geology and Infectious Diseases, having authored 7 papers that have together received 337 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geological and Geochemical Analysis (5 papers), High-pressure geophysics and materials (5 papers), earthquake and tectonic studies (4 papers), Geological and Geophysical Studies (1 paper), Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (1 paper), Geological and Tectonic Studies in Latin America (1 paper), Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis (1 paper) and Geological Studies and Exploration (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Geophysics (297 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (99 citations), Geochemistry and Petrology (15 citations), Paleontology (11 citations) and Geology (5 citations). S. W. Field has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Africa and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Stephen E. Haggerty, V. Sautter, Marilyn M. Lindstrom, David W. Mittlefehldt, D. D. Bogard, D. H. Garrison, F. R. Boyd, Jill Dill Pasteris, N. P. Pokhilenko and D. Graham Pearson. Their work appears in journals such as Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, Science, American Mineralogist, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta and Metic.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.