S. van Kaick

453 total citations
9 papers, 296 citations indexed

About

S. van Kaick is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Neurology and Psychiatry and Mental health. According to data from OpenAlex, S. van Kaick has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 296 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Rehabilitation, 4 papers in Neurology and 3 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health. Recurrent topics in S. van Kaick's work include Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (6 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (4 papers) and Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (3 papers). S. van Kaick is often cited by papers focused on Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (6 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (4 papers) and Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (3 papers). S. van Kaick collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United States and Switzerland. S. van Kaick's co-authors include Thomas Platz, C Eickhof, Uwe Engel, Cosima Pinkowski, Jan Mehrholz, Marcus Pohl, Thomas C. Winter, Sebastian Möller, Paul M. Arnold and Kirstin-Friederike Heise and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Neurology, Disability and Rehabilitation and Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

In The Last Decade

S. van Kaick

7 papers receiving 282 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
S. van Kaick Germany	6	252	145	88	74	52	9	296
Atsuko Ogata Japan	9	203 0.8×	117 0.8×	51 0.6×	83 1.1×	89 1.7×	19	328
M. Eckhardt Netherlands	6	282 1.1×	147 1.0×	79 0.9×	105 1.4×	40 0.8×	6	415
Floor E. Buma Netherlands	7	283 1.1×	153 1.1×	73 0.8×	115 1.6×	51 1.0×	7	374
Morgan L. Ingemanson United States	5	187 0.7×	104 0.7×	70 0.8×	41 0.6×	60 1.2×	8	242
Aditi A. Mullick Canada	9	228 0.9×	149 1.0×	135 1.5×	46 0.6×	55 1.1×	13	332
Liselot Thijs Belgium	10	249 1.0×	118 0.8×	84 1.0×	69 0.9×	35 0.7×	17	330
Angelica G. Thompson-Butel Australia	12	234 0.9×	85 0.6×	96 1.1×	39 0.5×	56 1.1×	19	326
Stéphanie Dehem Belgium	10	291 1.2×	110 0.8×	81 0.9×	37 0.5×	75 1.4×	20	342
Kate Kelly United Kingdom	5	207 0.8×	89 0.6×	51 0.6×	47 0.6×	34 0.7×	9	270
Monica A. Nelsen United States	6	355 1.4×	150 1.0×	129 1.5×	61 0.8×	43 0.8×	7	391

Countries citing papers authored by S. van Kaick

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of S. van Kaick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S. van Kaick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S. van Kaick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by S. van Kaick

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by S. van Kaick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S. van Kaick. The network helps show where S. van Kaick may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of S. van Kaick

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of S. van Kaick. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of S. van Kaick based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with S. van Kaick. S. van Kaick is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Kaick, S. van, Jeremy Walston, Uwe Malzahn, et al.. (2012). Rivermead Assessment of Somatosensory Performance. Der Nervenarzt. 83(12). 1632–1637. 7 indexed citations

2.

Platz, Thomas, et al.. (2009). Best Conventional Therapy Versus Modular Impairment-Oriented Training for Arm Paresis After Stroke: A Single-Blind, Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. Neurorehabilitation and neural repair. 23(7). 706–716. 77 indexed citations

3.

Geva, Diklah, et al.. (2009). Reo assessment to guide the ReoGo Therapy: Reliability and validity of novel robotic scores. 209–209. 7 indexed citations

4.

Platz, Thomas, Philippe Vuadens, C Eickhof, et al.. (2007). REPAS, a summary rating scale for resistance to passive movement: Item selection, reliability and validity. Disability and Rehabilitation. 30(1). 44–53. 46 indexed citations

5.

Kaick, S. van & Thomas Platz. (2006). Motorisches Assessment bei zentralen Paresen. Nervenheilkunde. 25(3). 159–165.

6.

Platz, Thomas, et al.. (2005). Impairment–oriented training and adaptive motor cortex reorganisation after stroke: a fTMS study. Journal of Neurology. 252(11). 1363–1371. 61 indexed citations

7.

Platz, Thomas, et al.. (2005). Impairment-oriented training or Bobath therapy for severe arm paresis after stroke: a single-blind, multicentre randomized controlled trial. Clinical Rehabilitation. 19(7). 714–724. 97 indexed citations

8.

Platz, Thomas, et al.. (2004). Impairment-oriented training and training-induced adaptive motor cortex reorganisation after stroke: a fTMS study. Aktuelle Neurologie. 31(S 1).

9.

Kaick, S. van. (2003). Evidenzbasierte Diagnostik und Therapie. physiopraxis. 1(3). 24–27. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact