S. Van Gorp

747 total citations
20 papers, 312 citations indexed

About

S. Van Gorp is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Spectroscopy. According to data from OpenAlex, S. Van Gorp has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 312 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 14 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 4 papers in Spectroscopy. Recurrent topics in S. Van Gorp's work include Atomic and Molecular Physics (12 papers), Nuclear physics research studies (10 papers) and Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (6 papers). S. Van Gorp is often cited by papers focused on Atomic and Molecular Physics (12 papers), Nuclear physics research studies (10 papers) and Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (6 papers). S. Van Gorp collaborates with scholars based in Belgium, Germany and Czechia. S. Van Gorp's co-authors include F. Wauters, M. Tandecki, D. Zákoucký, E. Traykov, I. S. Kraev, N. Severijns, S. Ulmer, Y. Yamazaki, A. Mooser and C. Smorra and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Physical Review A and Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment.

In The Last Decade

S. Van Gorp

20 papers receiving 297 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
S. Van Gorp Belgium 12 218 174 45 43 25 20 312
H. Nagahama Japan 9 155 0.7× 271 1.6× 26 0.6× 37 0.9× 62 2.5× 14 340
Sreeraj Nair India 16 496 2.3× 134 0.8× 40 0.9× 33 0.8× 9 0.4× 45 556
A. Marsman Canada 9 134 0.6× 284 1.6× 25 0.6× 49 1.1× 18 0.7× 11 350
B. L. Roberts United States 11 412 1.9× 159 0.9× 35 0.8× 36 0.8× 16 0.6× 28 477
G. S. Giri Netherlands 10 110 0.5× 318 1.8× 44 1.0× 51 1.2× 21 0.8× 18 361
A. A. Valverde United States 12 301 1.4× 136 0.8× 95 2.1× 44 1.0× 6 0.2× 43 375
Noemi Rocco United States 16 542 2.5× 175 1.0× 51 1.1× 51 1.2× 7 0.3× 37 607
Sabin Stoica Romania 14 614 2.8× 81 0.5× 32 0.7× 23 0.5× 15 0.6× 75 633
M. Bohman Germany 6 94 0.4× 151 0.9× 14 0.3× 21 0.5× 25 1.0× 10 198
Charles T. Munger United States 8 116 0.5× 213 1.2× 20 0.4× 24 0.6× 18 0.7× 14 266

Countries citing papers authored by S. Van Gorp

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of S. Van Gorp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S. Van Gorp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S. Van Gorp more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by S. Van Gorp

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by S. Van Gorp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S. Van Gorp. The network helps show where S. Van Gorp may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of S. Van Gorp

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of S. Van Gorp. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of S. Van Gorp based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with S. Van Gorp. S. Van Gorp is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Ulmer, S., C. Smorra, A. Mooser, et al.. (2015). High-precision comparison of the antiproton-to-proton charge-to-mass ratio. Nature. 524(7564). 196–199. 73 indexed citations
2.
Beck, M., M. Breitenfeldt, P. Finlay, et al.. (2015). Space-charge effects in Penning ion traps. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 785. 153–162. 3 indexed citations
3.
Smorra, C., A. Mooser, K. Franke, et al.. (2015). A reservoir trap for antiprotons. International Journal of Mass Spectrometry. 389. 10–13. 13 indexed citations
4.
Smorra, C., K. Blaum, M. J. Borchert, et al.. (2015). BASE – The Baryon Antibaryon Symmetry Experiment. The European Physical Journal Special Topics. 224(16). 3055–3108. 33 indexed citations
5.
Gorp, S. Van, M. Breitenfeldt, M. Tandecki, et al.. (2014). Firstβ−νcorrelation measurement from the recoil-energy spectrum of Penning trappedAr35ions. Physical Review C. 90(2). 8 indexed citations
6.
Ulmer, S., A. Mooser, K. Blaum, et al.. (2014). The magnetic moments of the proton and the antiproton. Institutional Repository of Leibniz Universität Hannover (Leibniz Universität Hannover). 5 indexed citations
7.
Fabre, B., B. Pons, X. Fléchard, et al.. (2013). Electron shakeoff following theβ+decay of trapped35Ar+ions. Physical Review A. 88(4). 14 indexed citations
8.
Gorp, S. Van, et al.. (2013). Improvements to the Simbuca trapped charged-particle simulation program. AIP conference proceedings. 300–308. 2 indexed citations
9.
Herlert, A., S. Van Gorp, D. Beck, et al.. (2012). Recoil-ion trapping for precision mass measurements. The European Physical Journal A. 48(7). 16 indexed citations
10.
Gorp, S. Van. (2012). Search for physics beyond the standard electroweak model with the WITCH experiment.. CERN Bulletin. 2 indexed citations
11.
Beck, M., В. Козлов, M. Breitenfeldt, et al.. (2011). First detection and energy measurement of recoil ions following beta decay in a Penning trap with the WITCH experiment. The European Physical Journal A. 47(3). 13 indexed citations
12.
Golovko, V. V., F. Wauters, Stefaan Cottenier, et al.. (2011). Hyperfine field and hyperfine anomalies of copper impurities in iron. Physical Review C. 84(1). 7 indexed citations
13.
Tandecki, M., D. Beck, M. Beck, et al.. (2010). Computer controls for the WITCH experiment. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 629(1). 396–405. 5 indexed citations
14.
Gorp, S. Van, M. Beck, M. Breitenfeldt, et al.. (2010). Simbuca, using a graphics card to simulate Coulomb interactions in a penning trap. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 638(1). 192–200. 20 indexed citations
15.
Wauters, F., I. S. Kraev, D. Zákoucký, et al.. (2010). Precision measurements of theCo60β-asymmetry parameter in search for tensor currents in weak interactions. Physical Review C. 82(5). 23 indexed citations
16.
Wauters, F., Brecht Verstichel, M. Breitenfeldt, et al.. (2010). Half-life ofFr221in Si and Au at 4 K and at millikelvin temperatures. Physical Review C. 82(6). 7 indexed citations
17.
Wauters, F., I. S. Kraev, M. Tandecki, et al.. (2009). Performance of silicon PIN photodiodes at low temperatures and in high magnetic fields. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 604(3). 563–567. 14 indexed citations
18.
Wauters, F., I. S. Kraev, M. Tandecki, et al.. (2009). βasymmetry parameter in the decay ofIn114. Physical Review C. 80(6). 20 indexed citations
19.
Wauters, F., I. S. Kraev, D. Zákoucký, et al.. (2009). A GEANT4 Monte-Carlo simulation code for precision β spectroscopy. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 609(2-3). 156–164. 12 indexed citations
20.
Козлов, В., M. Beck, P. Delahaye, et al.. (2008). The WITCH experiment: Acquiring the first recoil ion spectrum. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms. 266(19-20). 4515–4520. 22 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by H. Nagahama Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sreeraj Nair Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by A. Marsman Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by B. L. Roberts Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by G. S. Giri Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by A. A. Valverde Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Noemi Rocco Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sabin Stoica Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by M. Bohman Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Charles T. Munger
Rankless by CCL
2026