N. Severijns

4.6k total citations
153 papers, 1.8k citations indexed

About

N. Severijns is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Radiation. According to data from OpenAlex, N. Severijns has authored 153 papers receiving a total of 1.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 105 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 77 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 43 papers in Radiation. Recurrent topics in N. Severijns's work include Nuclear physics research studies (73 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (35 papers) and Neutrino Physics Research (35 papers). N. Severijns is often cited by papers focused on Nuclear physics research studies (73 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (35 papers) and Neutrino Physics Research (35 papers). N. Severijns collaborates with scholars based in Belgium, Switzerland and Germany. N. Severijns's co-authors include O. Naviliat-Cuncic, M. Beck, L. Vanneste, L. Hayen, T. Phalet, Jan Wouters, D. Vandeplassche, K. Bodek, E. van Walle and D. Zákoucký and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Reviews of Modern Physics.

In The Last Decade

N. Severijns

145 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
N. Severijns Belgium 21 1.5k 797 356 272 85 153 1.8k
S. Lunardi Italy 23 1.7k 1.2× 909 1.1× 472 1.3× 187 0.7× 120 1.4× 135 1.8k
G.P.A. Berg United States 22 1.3k 0.9× 696 0.9× 393 1.1× 222 0.8× 167 2.0× 129 1.5k
G. Kumbartzki United States 22 1.2k 0.8× 811 1.0× 419 1.2× 200 0.7× 96 1.1× 98 1.4k
T. Czosnyka Poland 20 1.1k 0.8× 593 0.7× 296 0.8× 135 0.5× 117 1.4× 71 1.2k
K. Katori Japan 22 1.7k 1.1× 926 1.2× 550 1.5× 168 0.6× 234 2.8× 102 1.9k
Ch. Droste Poland 21 1.1k 0.8× 732 0.9× 319 0.9× 225 0.8× 71 0.8× 70 1.3k
R. Beck Germany 25 1.6k 1.1× 421 0.5× 241 0.7× 98 0.4× 63 0.7× 74 1.8k
O. Zimmer France 25 733 0.5× 1.3k 1.6× 569 1.6× 222 0.8× 56 0.7× 109 1.8k
Donal B. Day United States 18 1.6k 1.1× 638 0.8× 163 0.5× 129 0.5× 92 1.1× 108 1.8k
J.M. Cavedon France 22 1.3k 0.9× 662 0.8× 241 0.7× 176 0.6× 78 0.9× 35 1.5k

Countries citing papers authored by N. Severijns

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of N. Severijns's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N. Severijns with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N. Severijns more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by N. Severijns

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by N. Severijns. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N. Severijns. The network helps show where N. Severijns may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of N. Severijns

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of N. Severijns. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of N. Severijns based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with N. Severijns. N. Severijns is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Severijns, N., et al.. (2023). Ft values of the mirror β transitions and the weak-magnetism-induced current in allowed nuclear β decay. Physical review. C. 107(1). 16 indexed citations
2.
Kozela, A., K. Bodek, K. Pysz, et al.. (2023). Search for beyond standard model physics in free neutron decay. Journal of Physics Conference Series. 2586(1). 12139–12139.
3.
Rozpędzik, D., et al.. (2023). Study of weak magnetism by precision spectrum shape measurements in nuclear beta decay. Journal of Physics Conference Series. 2586(1). 12141–12141. 1 indexed citations
4.
Hayen, L., Joel Kostensalo, N. Severijns, & J. Suhonen. (2019). First-forbidden transitions in the reactor anomaly. Physical review. C. 100(5). 45 indexed citations
5.
Blaum, K., Holger Müller, & N. Severijns. (2013). Precision experiments and fundamental physics at low energies - Part I. Annalen der Physik. 525(7). 2 indexed citations
6.
Beck, M., В. Козлов, M. Breitenfeldt, et al.. (2011). First detection and energy measurement of recoil ions following beta decay in a Penning trap with the WITCH experiment. The European Physical Journal A. 47(3). 13 indexed citations
7.
Severijns, N.. (2011). Tests of P-violation in neutron and nuclear beta decay. Hyperfine Interactions. 201(1-3). 47–55. 1 indexed citations
8.
Naviliat-Cuncic, O. & N. Severijns. (2009). Test of the Conserved Vector Current Hypothesis inT=1/2Mirror Transitions and New Determination of|Vud|. Physical Review Letters. 102(14). 142302–142302. 89 indexed citations
9.
Wauters, F., I. S. Kraev, M. Tandecki, et al.. (2009). Performance of silicon PIN photodiodes at low temperatures and in high magnetic fields. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 604(3). 563–567. 14 indexed citations
10.
Gurevich, G. M., P.D. Eversheim, V. V. Golovko, et al.. (2008). The effect of metallic environment and low temperature on the 253Es α decay rate. Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences Physics. 72(3). 315–318. 2 indexed citations
11.
Severijns, N., M. Beck, & O. Naviliat-Cuncic. (2006). Tests of the standard electroweak model in nuclear beta decay. Reviews of Modern Physics. 78(3). 991–1040. 199 indexed citations
12.
Козлов, В., M. Beck, M. Herbane, et al.. (2006). The WITCH experiment: towards weak interactions studies. Status and prospects. Hyperfine Interactions. 172(1-3). 15–22. 6 indexed citations
13.
Козлов, В., N. Severijns, D. Beck, et al.. (2006). The WITCH experiment: Completion of a set-up to investigate the structure of weak interactions with a Penning trap. International Journal of Mass Spectrometry. 251(2-3). 159–172. 16 indexed citations
14.
Bodek, K., G. Ban, A. Białek, et al.. (2005). Search for time reversal violating effects: R-Correlation measurement in neutron decay. Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology. 110(4). 461–461. 3 indexed citations
15.
Kraev, I. S., M. Beck, V. V. Golovko, et al.. (2005). A new Brute force low-temperature nuclear orientation set-up to search for physics beyond the standard electroweak model. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 555(1-2). 420–425. 9 indexed citations
16.
Vorobel, V., Ch. Briançon, V. Brudanin, et al.. (2003). Beta-neutrino angular correlation in the decay of 14O. The European Physical Journal A. 16(1). 139–147. 7 indexed citations
17.
Beck, Diane M., M. Beck, G. Bollen, et al.. (1999). An electromagnetic ion trap for studies in nuclear beta decay. AIP conference proceedings. 172–174. 2 indexed citations
18.
Schuurmans, P., J. Camps, Piet De Moor, et al.. (1999). Angular Distributions ofαParticles Emitted by Deformed Oriented Nuclei. Physical Review Letters. 82(24). 4787–4790. 18 indexed citations
19.
Krause, Jonas, I. Berkés, J. Camps, et al.. (1998). α particle angular distributions of189,191,193Bi. Physical Review C. 58(6). 3181–3186. 14 indexed citations
20.
Egorov, V., Ch. Briançon, V. Brudanin, et al.. (1997). Beta-neutrino angular correlation in the decay of 18Ne. Nuclear Physics A. 621(3). 745–753. 14 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by S. Lunardi Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by G.P.A. Berg Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by G. Kumbartzki Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by T. Czosnyka Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by K. Katori Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ch. Droste Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by R. Beck Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by O. Zimmer Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Donal B. Day Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by J.M. Cavedon
Rankless by CCL
2026