Anna Jervaeus

1.0k total citations
29 papers, 686 citations indexed

About

Anna Jervaeus is a scholar working on Oncology, General Health Professions and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Anna Jervaeus has authored 29 papers receiving a total of 686 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Oncology, 10 papers in General Health Professions and 9 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. Recurrent topics in Anna Jervaeus's work include Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (11 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (9 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (7 papers). Anna Jervaeus is often cited by papers focused on Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (11 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (9 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (7 papers). Anna Jervaeus collaborates with scholars based in Sweden, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Anna Jervaeus's co-authors include Yvonne Wengström, Lena Wettergren, Helene Rundqvist, Kate A. Bolam, Sara Mijwel, Claudia Lampic, Jenny Nilsson, Lars E. Eriksson, Linda Rainey and Daniëlle van der Waal and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Human Reproduction and Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

In The Last Decade

Anna Jervaeus

26 papers receiving 667 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Anna Jervaeus Sweden 15 397 204 134 105 104 29 686
Mehregan Haji‐Mahmoodi Iran 8 475 1.2× 122 0.6× 122 0.9× 97 0.9× 90 0.9× 9 643
Karen Meneses United States 14 352 0.9× 167 0.8× 132 1.0× 197 1.9× 123 1.2× 32 643
M Price Australia 10 287 0.7× 126 0.6× 85 0.6× 98 0.9× 67 0.6× 17 494
Sally A. Dominick United States 11 278 0.7× 180 0.9× 153 1.1× 265 2.5× 26 0.3× 15 657
Kim Sprunck‐Harrild United States 13 176 0.4× 129 0.6× 115 0.9× 126 1.2× 26 0.3× 25 441
Stephanie Tesson Australia 13 347 0.9× 177 0.9× 104 0.8× 128 1.2× 174 1.7× 27 682
Nayeon Kim South Korea 15 389 1.0× 123 0.6× 145 1.1× 122 1.2× 67 0.6× 45 806
PN Butow Australia 6 450 1.1× 220 1.1× 213 1.6× 157 1.5× 138 1.3× 13 596
Margaret Gleeson Australia 18 123 0.3× 118 0.6× 98 0.7× 97 0.9× 63 0.6× 55 804
Deborah Vollmer Dahlke United States 10 124 0.3× 193 0.9× 96 0.7× 153 1.5× 48 0.5× 21 513

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Jervaeus

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Jervaeus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Jervaeus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Jervaeus more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Jervaeus

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Jervaeus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Jervaeus. The network helps show where Anna Jervaeus may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anna Jervaeus

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anna Jervaeus. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anna Jervaeus based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anna Jervaeus. Anna Jervaeus is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
3.
4.
Kottorp, Anders, et al.. (2022). Different information needs—The major reasons for calling the helpline when invited to colorectal cancer screening. Health Expectations. 25(4). 1548–1554. 4 indexed citations
5.
Vogelsang, Ann‐Christin von, Carolin Nymark, Susanne Pettersson, & Anna Jervaeus. (2022). “My head feels like it has gone through a mixer” – a qualitative interview study on recovery 1 year after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Disability and Rehabilitation. 45(8). 1323–1331. 6 indexed citations
6.
Wengström, Yvonne, et al.. (2021). Two sides of every coin: individuals’ experiences of undergoing colorectal cancer screening by faecal immunochemical test and colonoscopy. European Journal of Public Health. 31(6). 1290–1295. 13 indexed citations
7.
Rainey, Linda, Daniëlle van der Waal, Anna Jervaeus, et al.. (2020). European women’s perceptions of the implementation and organisation of risk-based breast cancer screening and prevention: a qualitative study. BMC Cancer. 20(1). 247–247. 27 indexed citations
8.
Wengström, Yvonne, et al.. (2020). Decision-making about participation in colorectal cancer screening in Sweden: Autonomous, value-dependent but uninformed?. Patient Education and Counseling. 104(4). 919–926. 7 indexed citations
9.
Mijwel, Sara, Anna Jervaeus, Kate A. Bolam, et al.. (2019). High-intensity exercise during chemotherapy induces beneficial effects 12 months into breast cancer survivorship. Journal of Cancer Survivorship. 13(2). 244–256. 79 indexed citations
11.
Rainey, Linda, Anna Jervaeus, Louise S. Donnelly, et al.. (2019). Women's perceptions of personalized risk‐based breast cancer screening and prevention: An international focus group study. Psycho-Oncology. 28(5). 1056–1062. 49 indexed citations
12.
Vogelsang, Ann‐Christin von, et al.. (2018). Are anxiety levels associated with the decision to participate in a Swedish colorectal cancer screening programme? A nationwide cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 8(12). e025109–e025109. 14 indexed citations
13.
Rainey, Linda, Daniëlle van der Waal, Anna Jervaeus, et al.. (2018). Are we ready for the challenge of implementing risk-based breast cancer screening and primary prevention?. The Breast. 39. 24–32. 35 indexed citations
14.
Jervaeus, Anna, et al.. (2018). Health literacy levels and views about being invited to a colorectal cancer screening program. Acta Oncologica. 57(6). 743–749. 14 indexed citations
15.
Jervaeus, Anna, et al.. (2017). The importance of peoples values and preferences in promoting colorectal cancer screening participation. European Journal of Public Health. 1 indexed citations
16.
Mijwel, Sara, Malin Backman, Kate A. Bolam, et al.. (2017). Adding high-intensity interval training to conventional training modalities: optimizing health-related outcomes during chemotherapy for breast cancer: the OptiTrain randomized controlled trial. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. 168(1). 79–93. 126 indexed citations
17.
Jervaeus, Anna, et al.. (2017). Translation and cultural adaption of the decisions module for colorectal cancer screening into a Swedish version – the SCREESCO questionnaire. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology. 52(11). 1248–1252. 4 indexed citations
18.
Wettergren, Lena, Lars E. Eriksson, Jenny Nilsson, Anna Jervaeus, & Claudia Lampic. (2016). Content Analysis of Online Focus Group Discussions are a Valid and Feasible Mode When Investigating Sensitive Topics Among Young Persons With a Cancer Experience. JMIR Research Protocols. 5(2). e86–e86. 24 indexed citations
19.
Jervaeus, Anna, Jenny Nilsson, Lars E. Eriksson, et al.. (2015). Exploring childhood cancer survivors' views about sex and sexual experiences -findings from online focus group discussions. European Journal of Oncology Nursing. 20. 165–172. 28 indexed citations
20.
Nilsson, Jenny, Anna Jervaeus, Claudia Lampic, et al.. (2014). 'Will I be able to have a baby?' Results from online focus group discussions with childhood cancer survivors in Sweden. Human Reproduction. 29(12). 2704–2711. 114 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026