S. Thomas Forgue

28 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

S. Thomas Forgue
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Molecular Medicine 292
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 78
  • Pharmacology 482
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 249
  • Pharmacology 99
Replace John Lettieri with:
John Lettieri United States
Elizabeth Ludwig United States
Wen Chyi Shyu United States
Douglas S. Greene United States
Diansong Zhou United States
Shitalben Patel United States
Al‐Motassem Yousef Jordan
Helen Winter United States
John F. Rogers United States
Richard J. Fruncillo United States
S. Thomas Forgue relative to John Lettieri United States John Lettieri's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
John Lettieri · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by S. Thomas Forgue

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of S. Thomas Forgue's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S. Thomas Forgue with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S. Thomas Forgue more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by S. Thomas Forgue

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by S. Thomas Forgue. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S. Thomas Forgue. The network helps show where S. Thomas Forgue may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside S. Thomas Forgue, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with S. Thomas Forgue Line = papers co-authored together S. Thomas Forgue links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 200715
2 200683
3 200648
4 2005226
5 200568
6 200417
7 200382
8 199612
9 19961
10 19966
11 199613
12 199610
13 199145
14 1990111
15 198715
16 198786
17 19875
18 198730
19 198226
20 197820

About S. Thomas Forgue

S. Thomas Forgue is a scholar working on Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Molecular Medicine, Pharmacology, Pharmacology and Clinical Biochemistry, having authored 28 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (8 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (6 papers), Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms (5 papers), Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (5 papers), Sexual function and dysfunction studies (4 papers), Antibiotic Use and Resistance (3 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (3 papers) and Hormonal and reproductive studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Medicine (292 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (78 citations), Pharmacology (482 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (249 citations) and Pharmacology (99 citations). S. Thomas Forgue has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Rashmi H. Barbhaiya, Kelly Pittman, Alun Bedding, Beverley Patterson, Diane L. Phillips, Christopher D. Payne, Malcolm I. Mitchell, Rebecca E. Wrishko, C A Knupp and Carol Gleason. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Drug Metabolism and Disposition.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026