S Moss

1.2k citations
19 papers · 852 indexed · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

S Moss

18 papers receiving 785 citations

Peers

S Moss
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
  • Clinical Psychology 206
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 183
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 91
  • Epidemiology 169
  • General Psychology 5
Replace Donna Anderson with:
Donna Anderson United States
Mary Mathew India
Sarah Williams United Kingdom
Sharon Ryan United States
Thomas Schlich Canada
Miriam Shuchman United States
Tracy Higgins United Kingdom
Camille A. Clare United States
June H. Lee United States
Lori H. Erby United States
S Moss relative to Donna Anderson United States Donna Anderson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Donna Anderson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by S Moss

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of S Moss's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S Moss with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S Moss more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by S Moss

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by S Moss. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S Moss. The network helps show where S Moss may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside S Moss, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with S Moss Line = papers co-authored together S Moss links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 20123
2 20093
3 200815
4 200895
5 20081
6 200639
7 2006104
8
[The factors that determine participation in cervical cancer screening in the state of Morelos].
20008
9 1998403
10 19961
11 199312
12 199126
13 19905
14
Cervical cancer screening in Iceland: a case-control study.
198617
15 198452
16 198435
17
Initial results from a programme of breast self-examination.
198313
18 198318
19 19812

About S Moss

S Moss is a scholar working on Health, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Occupational Therapy, Oncology and Microbiology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 852 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (4 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (3 papers), Down syndrome and intellectual disability research (2 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (2 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (2 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (2 papers), Genital Health and Disease (2 papers) and Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (206 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (183 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (91 citations), Epidemiology (169 citations) and General Psychology (5 citations). S Moss has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Pradip Patel, Sarah E. Turner, Chris Hatton, Neill Simpson, Helen Costello, Helen Prosser, James Hogg, J Melia, Robert F. Hobson and Frank Margison. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Cancer, Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, Histopathology, The British Journal of Psychiatry and Family Practice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026