S. M. Link

1.1k citations
29 papers · 716 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

S. M. Link

23 papers receiving 603 citations

Peers

S. M. Link
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 639
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 657
  • Spectroscopy 85
  • Biophysics 25
  • Instrumentation 5
Replace Dominik Waldburger with:
Dominik Waldburger Switzerland
B. W. Tilma Switzerland
William Loh United States
M. Mangold Switzerland
Alexander Sahm Germany
J. Lasri United States
Albert van Rees Netherlands
Naoya Kuse Japan
G. Steinmeyer Switzerland
Jörn P. Epping Netherlands
S. M. Link relative to Dominik Waldburger Switzerland Dominik Waldburger's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Dominik Waldburger · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by S. M. Link

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of S. M. Link's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S. M. Link with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S. M. Link more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by S. M. Link

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by S. M. Link. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S. M. Link. The network helps show where S. M. Link may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside S. M. Link, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with S. M. Link Line = papers co-authored together S. M. Link links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017142
2 2015123
3 201588
4 201470
5 201665
6 201339
7 201737
8 201433
9 201729
10 201624
11 201421
12 201815
13 20167
14 20175
15 20164
16 20163
17 20193
18 20162
19 20161
20 20171

About S. M. Link

S. M. Link is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Biophysics, Infectious Diseases and Organic Chemistry, having authored 29 papers that have together received 716 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (29 papers), Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices (26 papers), Photonic and Optical Devices (19 papers), Solid State Laser Technologies (10 papers), Laser Design and Applications (1 paper), Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (1 paper) and Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (639 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (657 citations), Spectroscopy (85 citations), Biophysics (25 citations) and Instrumentation (5 citations). S. M. Link has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Germany and Israel. Frequent co-authors include U. Keller, Dominik Waldburger, M. Golling, B. W. Tilma, M. Mangold, C. A. Zaugg, Alexander Klenner, D. J. H. C. Maas, E. Gini and C. G. E. Alfieri. Their work appears in journals such as Optics Express, Biomedical Optics Express, IEEE photonics journal, Science and Optica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact