S. Kyle McKay

865 total citations
39 papers, 409 citations indexed

About

S. Kyle McKay is a scholar working on Ecology, Water Science and Technology and Nature and Landscape Conservation. According to data from OpenAlex, S. Kyle McKay has authored 39 papers receiving a total of 409 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 27 papers in Ecology, 16 papers in Water Science and Technology and 15 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation. Recurrent topics in S. Kyle McKay's work include Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (16 papers), Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes (16 papers) and Fish Ecology and Management Studies (14 papers). S. Kyle McKay is often cited by papers focused on Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (16 papers), Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes (16 papers) and Fish Ecology and Management Studies (14 papers). S. Kyle McKay collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Canada. S. Kyle McKay's co-authors include J. C. Fischenich, John R. Schramski, Seth J. Wenger, Charles B. van Rees, Daniel J. Wieferich, Arthur R. Cooper, Suman Jumani, Matthew W. Diebel, Craig Fischenich and Mary C. Freeman and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

S. Kyle McKay

34 papers receiving 389 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
S. Kyle McKay United States	12	260	193	130	126	60	39	409
Sang Lian-hai China	4	194 0.7×	145 0.8×	138 1.1×	143 1.1×	33 0.6×	10	409
Jeff J. Opperman United States	12	372 1.4×	319 1.7×	199 1.5×	218 1.7×	119 2.0×	17	634
John Conallin Australia	13	276 1.1×	313 1.6×	226 1.7×	125 1.0×	23 0.4×	42	525
Christos Theodoropoulos Greece	14	286 1.1×	247 1.3×	172 1.3×	60 0.5×	22 0.4×	28	425
Klaus Jorde United States	9	355 1.4×	270 1.4×	270 2.1×	122 1.0×	125 2.1×	13	547
Mònica Bardina Spain	8	150 0.6×	167 0.9×	100 0.8×	113 0.9×	13 0.2×	11	319
Bernd Cyffka Germany	12	196 0.8×	160 0.8×	110 0.8×	201 1.6×	134 2.2×	52	478
Brian S. Ickes United States	12	303 1.2×	241 1.2×	175 1.3×	231 1.8×	56 0.9×	27	497
Vanessa Reis Australia	6	188 0.7×	105 0.5×	59 0.5×	139 1.1×	18 0.3×	10	321
T. J. Hillman Australia	12	275 1.1×	285 1.5×	142 1.1×	93 0.7×	51 0.8×	18	503

Countries citing papers authored by S. Kyle McKay

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of S. Kyle McKay's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S. Kyle McKay with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S. Kyle McKay more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by S. Kyle McKay

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by S. Kyle McKay. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S. Kyle McKay. The network helps show where S. Kyle McKay may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of S. Kyle McKay

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of S. Kyle McKay. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of S. Kyle McKay based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with S. Kyle McKay. S. Kyle McKay is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Rees, Charles B. van, et al.. (2025). Guideposts and guardrails for biodiversity accounting in the 21st century. Biological Conservation. 313. 111527–111527.

Phillips, Steven J., et al.. (2025). A Phased Approach to Urban Stream Restoration Decision-Making in Utoy Creek, Atlanta, Georgia. Land. 14(3). 449–449.

Porter, Michael D., et al.. (2024). Hydraulic analysis for assessing environmental flow selection and ecological model formulation. Ecohydrology. 17(4). 4 indexed citations

Surbeck, Cristiane Q., et al.. (2024). Lifecycle cost and benefit analysis for parcel-scale implementation of green stormwater infrastructure. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3(2). 100139–100139. 1 indexed citations

McKay, S. Kyle, et al.. (2024). Facilitating Dam Removal Decisions With Multiple Objectives. River Research and Applications. 41(3). 745–754. 2 indexed citations

Duda, Jeffrey J., Suman Jumani, Daniel J. Wieferich, et al.. (2023). Patterns, drivers, and a predictive model of dam removal cost in the United States. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution. 11. 11 indexed citations

McKay, S. Kyle, Seth J. Wenger, Charles B. van Rees, Brian P. Bledsoe, & Todd S. Bridges. (2023). Jointly advancing infrastructure and biodiversity conservation. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment. 4(10). 675–677. 8 indexed citations

Rees, Charles B. van, Roderick W. Lammers, James E. Byers, et al.. (2023). Reimagining infrastructure for a biodiverse future. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 120(46). e2214334120–e2214334120. 14 indexed citations

Rees, Charles B. van, et al.. (2023). The potential for nature-based solutions to combat the freshwater biodiversity crisis. PLOS Water. 2(6). e0000126–e0000126. 32 indexed citations

10.

Freeman, Mary C., Kevin R. Bestgen, Daren M. Carlisle, et al.. (2022). Toward Improved Understanding of Streamflow Effects on Freshwater Fishes. Fisheries. 47(7). 290–298. 38 indexed citations

11.

Suedel, Burton, et al.. (2022). Engineering coastal structures to centrally embrace biodiversity. Journal of Environmental Management. 323. 116138–116138. 14 indexed citations

12.

Rees, Charles B. van, S. Kyle McKay, C. Brock Woodson, et al.. (2022). A strategic monitoring approach for learning to improve natural infrastructure. The Science of The Total Environment. 832. 155078–155078. 16 indexed citations

13.

McKay, S. Kyle, et al.. (2021). Principles for data management, visualization, and communication to improve disaster response management: Lessons from the Hurricane Maria response mission. Journal of Emergency Management. 19(8). 255–269.

14.

German, Laura, et al.. (2020). Evaluating Mismatches between Legislation and Practice in Maintaining Environmental Flows. Water. 12(8). 2135–2135. 1 indexed citations

15.

McKay, S. Kyle, et al.. (2019). Building a hydrologic foundation for tropical watershed management. PLoS ONE. 14(3). e0213306–e0213306. 4 indexed citations

16.

McKay, S. Kyle, et al.. (2019). Long‐term (37 years) impacts of low‐head dams on freshwater shrimp habitat connectivity in northeastern Puerto Rico. River Research and Applications. 35(7). 1034–1043. 6 indexed citations

17.

McKay, S. Kyle & J. C. Fischenich. (2014). Case Study: Sensitivity Analysis of the Barataria Basin Barrier Shoreline Wetland Value Assessment Model. US Army Corps of Engineers: Engineer Research and Development Center (Knowledge Core).

18.

McKay, S. Kyle. (2013). Alternative environmental flow management schemes. US Army Corps of Engineers: Engineer Research and Development Center (Knowledge Core). 1 indexed citations

19.

McKay, S. Kyle, et al.. (2013). Assessing upstream fish passage connectivity with network analysis. Ecological Applications. 23(6). 1396–1409. 64 indexed citations

20.

McKay, S. Kyle, et al.. (2011). Environmental benefits analysis of fish passage on the Truckee River, Nevada : a case study of multi-action-dependent benefits quantification. US Army Corps of Engineers: Engineer Research and Development Center (Knowledge Core). 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact