J. C. Fischenich

635 total citations
35 papers, 360 citations indexed

About

J. C. Fischenich is a scholar working on Ecology, Soil Science and Water Science and Technology. According to data from OpenAlex, J. C. Fischenich has authored 35 papers receiving a total of 360 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 24 papers in Ecology, 12 papers in Soil Science and 12 papers in Water Science and Technology. Recurrent topics in J. C. Fischenich's work include Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes (20 papers), Soil erosion and sediment transport (12 papers) and Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (9 papers). J. C. Fischenich is often cited by papers focused on Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes (20 papers), Soil erosion and sediment transport (12 papers) and Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (9 papers). J. C. Fischenich collaborates with scholars based in United States. J. C. Fischenich's co-authors include Richard A. Fischer, Steven R. Abt, S. Kyle McKay, John R. Schramski, Christopher I. Thornton, Ronald R. Copeland, David S. Biedenharn, Charles D. Bonham, Patrick J. Braaten and Sarah J. Miller and has published in prestigious journals such as Ecological Applications, Journal of Hydraulic Engineering and Journal of Arid Environments.

In The Last Decade

J. C. Fischenich

25 papers receiving 311 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
J. C. Fischenich United States 11 239 124 111 110 78 35 360
Brian Cluer United States 10 387 1.6× 210 1.7× 146 1.3× 99 0.9× 85 1.1× 16 446
John M. Faustini United States 8 434 1.8× 227 1.8× 199 1.8× 146 1.3× 55 0.7× 12 476
Janine M. Castro United States 7 358 1.5× 156 1.3× 202 1.8× 89 0.8× 110 1.4× 15 423
Craig Fischenich United States 11 277 1.2× 114 0.9× 78 0.7× 55 0.5× 92 1.2× 25 390
Ian C. O’Neill Australia 9 272 1.1× 168 1.4× 119 1.1× 52 0.5× 68 0.9× 15 365
M. Karl Wood United States 9 165 0.7× 172 1.4× 70 0.6× 54 0.5× 98 1.3× 10 336
R. W. Knight United States 10 189 0.8× 122 1.0× 73 0.7× 67 0.6× 109 1.4× 23 352
Meta Francis Justine China 12 102 0.4× 186 1.5× 59 0.5× 113 1.0× 126 1.6× 17 388
David L. Wegner United States 5 138 0.6× 73 0.6× 157 1.4× 50 0.5× 133 1.7× 11 315
Luiz Felippe Salemi Brazil 10 136 0.6× 137 1.1× 148 1.3× 46 0.4× 135 1.7× 45 343

Countries citing papers authored by J. C. Fischenich

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. C. Fischenich's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. C. Fischenich with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. C. Fischenich more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. C. Fischenich

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. C. Fischenich. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. C. Fischenich. The network helps show where J. C. Fischenich may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. C. Fischenich

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. C. Fischenich. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. C. Fischenich based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. C. Fischenich. J. C. Fischenich is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Fischenich, J. C., et al.. (2018). Evaluating flow management as a strategy to recover an endangered sturgeon species in the Upper Missouri River, USA. River Research and Applications. 34(10). 1254–1266. 19 indexed citations
2.
Fischenich, J. C., et al.. (2017). In Situ Root Volume Estimation Using Ground Penetrating Radar. Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics. 22(3). 209–221. 14 indexed citations
3.
McKay, S. Kyle & J. C. Fischenich. (2014). Case Study: Sensitivity Analysis of the Barataria Basin Barrier Shoreline Wetland Value Assessment Model. US Army Corps of Engineers: Engineer Research and Development Center (Knowledge Core).
4.
Price, David L., et al.. (2014). Retrospective evaluation of Corps aquatic ecosystem restoration projects protocol part 1 : Project overview. US Army Corps of Engineers: Engineer Research and Development Center (Knowledge Core). 1 indexed citations
5.
McKay, S. Kyle, et al.. (2013). Assessing upstream fish passage connectivity with network analysis. Ecological Applications. 23(6). 1396–1409. 64 indexed citations
6.
Miller, Sarah J., et al.. (2012). The use of reference ecosystems as a basis for assessing restoration benefits. US Army Corps of Engineers: Engineer Research and Development Center (Knowledge Core). 3 indexed citations
7.
McKay, S. Kyle, et al.. (2011). Environmental benefits analysis of fish passage on the Truckee River, Nevada : a case study of multi-action-dependent benefits quantification. US Army Corps of Engineers: Engineer Research and Development Center (Knowledge Core). 3 indexed citations
8.
Fischenich, J. C., et al.. (2006). Engineering and Ecological Aspects of Dam Removal-An Overview. US Army Corps of Engineers: Engineer Research and Development Center (Knowledge Core). 1 indexed citations
9.
Fischenich, J. C.. (2003). Effects of Riprap on Riverine and Riparian Ecosystems. Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC). 21(5). 508–13. 12 indexed citations
10.
Fischenich, J. C. & Jos van Alphen. (2002). Guidelines for sustainable inland waterways and navigation. 511. 2 indexed citations
11.
Fischenich, J. C. & Ronald R. Copeland. (2001). Environmental considerations for vegetation in flood control channels. US Army Corps of Engineers: Engineer Research and Development Center (Knowledge Core). 2 indexed citations
12.
Fischenich, J. C., et al.. (2001). Bioengineering as a Tool for Restoring Ecological Integrity to the Carson River. US Army Corps of Engineers: Engineer Research and Development Center (Knowledge Core). 4 indexed citations
13.
Copeland, Ronald R., David S. Biedenharn, & J. C. Fischenich. (2000). Channel-Forming Discharge. US Army Corps of Engineers: Engineer Research and Development Center (Knowledge Core). 24 indexed citations
14.
Fischenich, J. C., et al.. (2000). Plant Material Acquisition, Layout, and Handling for Flood Control Projects. US Army Corps of Engineers: Engineer Research and Development Center (Knowledge Core). 1 indexed citations
15.
Bonham, Charles D., et al.. (1998). Modification of the point frame for quantitative hydraulic investigations.. UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona). 20(4). 25–27. 1 indexed citations
16.
Fischenich, J. C., et al.. (1998). EFFECT OF WOODY DEBRIS ENTRAPMENT ON FLOW RESISTANCE1. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association. 34(5). 1189–1197. 45 indexed citations
17.
Davis, Mary M., et al.. (1996). Environmental Value of Riparian Vegetation.. US Army Corps of Engineers: Engineer Research and Development Center (Knowledge Core). 5 indexed citations
18.
Fischenich, J. C. & Steven R. Abt. (1995). Estimating Flow Resistance in Vegetated Channels. Water resources engineering. 805–809. 1 indexed citations
19.
Fischenich, J. C.. (1994). Instream and Streambank Environmental Feature Guidelines. Hydraulic Engineering. 406–410. 2 indexed citations
20.
Fischenich, J. C.. (1990). Cumulative Impacts Analysis on a Midwest Fluvial System. Hydraulic Engineering. 802–807. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026