S. Harries

13 papers receiving 462 citations

Peers

S. Harries
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Dermatology 156
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 261
  • Cancer Research 196
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 96
  • Surgery 183
Replace Sandra E. Mitchell with:
Sandra E. Mitchell United States
C Frouge France
R.F. van der Sluis Netherlands
M. Boisserie-Lacroix France
Elvira Ferreira Marques Brazil
A. Jill Leibman United States
Fuat Celebioglu Sweden
E Caramella France
Eric G. Aguero United States
G. Melvin Stevens United States
S. Harries relative to Sandra E. Mitchell United States Sandra E. Mitchell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Sandra E. Mitchell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by S. Harries

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of S. Harries's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S. Harries with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S. Harries more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by S. Harries

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by S. Harries. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S. Harries. The network helps show where S. Harries may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside S. Harries, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with S. Harries Line = papers co-authored together S. Harries links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2001198
2 199481
3 199853
4 199441
5 201931
6
A survey of the management of breast cancer in England and Wales.
199625
7 199322
8 19899
9 20109
10
Why should diagnostic benign breast biopsies weight less than twenty grams?
20014
11 19973
12 19942
13 19931
14 20090

About S. Harries

S. Harries is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Surgery, Oncology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 14 papers that have together received 479 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (7 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (4 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (3 papers), Optical Coherence Tomography Applications (2 papers), Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine (2 papers), Breast Implant and Reconstruction (2 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (1 paper) and Transportation Safety and Impact Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Dermatology (156 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (261 citations), Cancer Research (196 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (96 citations) and Surgery (183 citations). S. Harries has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Z. Amin, William R. Lees, M.W. Kissin, S. G. Bown, Maureen E. Smith, Martin Cook, Julie Cooke, S E Harms, Sean Brown and D P Flamig. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Surgical Oncology, Postgraduate Medical Journal, BJS Open, American Journal of Roentgenology and European Journal of Cancer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact