S. Fichet
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 5%
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 5%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics top 10%
- Artificial Intelligence
- Co-authors
- Gero von GersdorffC. RoyonPhilippe BraxPhilip TañedoB. LenziM. SaimpertChristophe RoyonM. Quirós
- Topics
- Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (24 papers)Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (23 papers)Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (22 papers)
- Partner nations
- BrazilFranceUnited States
In The Last Decade
S. Fichet
39 papers receiving 682 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 29
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 634
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 299
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 79
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 64
- Artificial Intelligence 21
Countries citing papers authored by S. Fichet
This map shows the geographic impact of S. Fichet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S. Fichet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S. Fichet more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by S. Fichet
This network shows the impact of papers produced by S. Fichet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S. Fichet. The network helps show where S. Fichet may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of S. Fichet
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of S. Fichet. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of S. Fichet based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with S. Fichet. S. Fichet is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 13 | |
| 8 | 15 | |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 20 | |
| 12 | 17 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 40 | |
| 15 | 47 | |
| 16 | The supersymmetric flavour problem in 5D GUTs and its consequences for LHC phenomenology | 1 |
| 17 | 47 | |
| 18 | 20 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | Probing the scale of New Physics at the LHC | 1 |
About S. Fichet
S. Fichet is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 42 papers that have together received 692 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (24 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (23 papers) and Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (22 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (634 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (299 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (64 citations). S. Fichet has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, France and United States. Frequent co-authors include Gero von Gersdorff, C. Royon, Philippe Brax, Philip Tañedo, B. Lenzi, M. Saimpert, Christophe Royon, M. Quirós, Eugenio Megías and G. Moreau. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Nuclear Physics B and Physics Letters B.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.