This map shows the geographic impact of S. E. Levine's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S. E. Levine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S. E. Levine more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by S. E. Levine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S. E. Levine. The network helps show where S. E. Levine may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of S. E. Levine
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of S. E. Levine.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of S. E. Levine based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with S. E. Levine. S. E. Levine is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Massey, Philip, S. E. Levine, Kathryn F. Neugent, et al.. (2018). A Runaway Giant in the Galactic Halo∗. The Astronomical Journal. 156(6). 265–265.4 indexed citations
6.
Bosh, A. S., J. Wolf, S. E. Levine, et al.. (2018). Airborne and Ground Observations of the Stellar Occultation by Triton on 5 October 2017. 50.
7.
Pasachoff, Jay M., B. A. Babcock, Christina H. Seeger, et al.. (2015). A Central Flash at an Occultation of a Bright Star by Pluto Soon Before New Horizons' Flyby.1 indexed citations
8.
Zuluaga, C. A., et al.. (2015). Placing SOFIA in the central flash for the 29 June 2015 Pluto Occultation. DPS.1 indexed citations
9.
Zuluaga, C. A., Molly Kosiarek, D. J. Osip, et al.. (2014). Atmospheric state of Pluto from the 31 July 2014 stellar occultation. DPS.1 indexed citations
10.
Pasachoff, Jay M., Christina H. Seeger, B. A. Babcock, et al.. (2014). Coordinated Occultation Observations for Pluto, Nix, and Quaoar in July 2014. 46.1 indexed citations
11.
Massey, Philip, Thomas A. Bida, Peter L. Collins, et al.. (2013). As Big and As Good As It Gets: The Large Monolithic Imager for Lowell Observatory's 4.3-m Discovery Channel Telescope. 221.2 indexed citations
12.
Dunham, Edward W., Thomas A. Bida, A. S. Bosh, et al.. (2012). First Stellar Occultation Observation with SOFIA. AAS. 219.1 indexed citations
13.
Henden, A. A., Thomas C. Smith, S. E. Levine, & D. Terrell. (2012). The AAVSO Photometric All-Sky Survey Completes the Sky. 220.2 indexed citations
14.
Henden, A. A., S. E. Levine, D. Terrell, Thomas C. Smith, & D. L. Welch. (2011). Data Release 3 of the AAVSO All-Sky Photometric Survey (APASS). 218(1). 430.5 indexed citations
15.
Elliot, J. L., A. S. Bosh, A. M. Zangari, et al.. (2011). Constraints On The Size Of KBO (50000) Quaoar From A Single-chord Stellar Occultation. AAS. 218.2 indexed citations
16.
Elliot, J. L., A. S. Bosh, A. A. S. Gulbis, et al.. (2010). Pluto's Atmosphere from the July 2010 Stellar Occultation. DPS.2 indexed citations
17.
Harris, Hugh C., B. Canzian, C. C. Dahn, et al.. (2005). Progress in Parallaxes at USNO. Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC). 338. 122.1 indexed citations
18.
Zacharias, N., D. G. Monet, S. E. Levine, et al.. (2004). The Naval Observatory Merged Astrometric Dataset (NOMAD). AAS. 205.24 indexed citations
19.
Buie, M. W., J. L. Elliot, M. Kidger, et al.. (2002). Changes in Pluto's Atmosphere Revealed by the P126A Occultation. 34.1 indexed citations
20.
Elliot, J. L., R. G. French, R. L. Baron, et al.. (1987). A Four Day Occultation by Uranus and its Rings. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 19. 884.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.