S. De Potter
- Nutrition and Dietetics top 1%
- Surgery top 10%
- Gastroenterology top 5%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 10%
- Co-authors
- C. RicourOlivier GouletV. ColombNicole BrousseOdile CorriolNadine Cerf–BensussanY. RévillonC Ricour
- Topics
- Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology (26 papers)Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (5 papers)Pediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- FranceUnited KingdomGermany
In The Last Decade
S. De Potter
43 papers receiving 972 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
- Nutrition and Dietetics 670
- Surgery 474
- Gastroenterology 152
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 149
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 116
Countries citing papers authored by S. De Potter
This map shows the geographic impact of S. De Potter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S. De Potter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S. De Potter more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by S. De Potter
This network shows the impact of papers produced by S. De Potter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S. De Potter. The network helps show where S. De Potter may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of S. De Potter
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of S. De Potter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of S. De Potter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with S. De Potter. S. De Potter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 10 | |
| 8 | 103 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 93 | |
| 11 | 77 | |
| 12 | 18 | |
| 13 | 32 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 80 | |
| 16 | Which patients need small bowel transplantation for neonatal short bowel syndrome? | 20 |
| 17 | 11 | |
| 18 | 130 | |
| 19 | RESECTION ETENDUE DU GRELE EN PERIODE NEONATALE | 2 |
| 20 | 82 |
About S. De Potter
S. De Potter is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Nutrition and Dietetics and Clinical Biochemistry, having authored 45 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology (26 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (5 papers) and Pediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nutrition and Dietetics (670 citations), Gastroenterology (152 citations) and Transplantation (39 citations). S. De Potter has collaborated with scholars based in France, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include C. Ricour, Olivier Goulet, V. Colomb, Nicole Brousse, Odile Corriol, Nadine Cerf–Bensussan, Y. Révillon, C Ricour, Stephen Lortat‐Jacob and Jean‐François Mougenot. Their work appears in journals such as Gastroenterology, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition and The Journal of Pediatrics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.