S. de Boer

7 papers receiving 15 citations

Peers

S. de Boer
Comparison fields: 5 of 31
  • History and Philosophy of Science 7
  • Philosophy 7
  • Global and Planetary Change 4
  • Political Science and International Relations 3
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3
Replace Hippolyte Taine with:
Hippolyte Taine
Robert Chodat United States
Cristina Viano France
John Philoponus
Adrian Keane United Kingdom
Paul Tannery
Wolfram Kinzig Germany
Thomas Wayland Vaughan
W. H. Mallock
Albrecht von Haller
S. de Boer relative to Hippolyte Taine Hippolyte Taine's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Hippolyte Taine · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by S. de Boer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of S. de Boer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S. de Boer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S. de Boer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by S. de Boer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by S. de Boer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S. de Boer. The network helps show where S. de Boer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of S. de Boer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of S. de Boer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of S. de Boer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with S. de Boer. S. de Boer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 3
2
John Buridan on the Internal Senses
1
3
Katerina Ierodiakonou and Sophie Roux (eds.), Thought Experiments in Methodological and Historical Contexts (Medieval and Early Modern Science, 15). Leiden/Boston: Brill 2011
5
4 4
5
Psychology and the other disciplines : a case of cross-disciplinary interaction (1250-1750)
2
6 0
7
Gerard of Odo on the atomistic structure of continua. A discussion and edition of a tract found in ms. Madrid, Biblioteca Nacional 4229
0
8 0
9
Zoektocht naar nationale beleidsruimte in de EU-richtlijnen voor het milieu- en natuurbeleid : een vergelijking van de implementatie van de Vogel- en Habitatrichtlijn, de Kaderrichtlijn Water en de Nitraatrichtlijn in Nederland, Engeland en Noordrijn-Westfalen
6
10
Van varkenspest tot integrale gebiedsontwikkeling : evaluatie van de reconstructie zandgebieden
2
11
Haalbaarheidsstudie drijvende kassen: samenvatting, resultaten
1
12 1

About S. de Boer

S. de Boer is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy and Anthropology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 25 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Philosophy and Science (2 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (2 papers) and Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (7 citations), Philosophy (7 citations) and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (3 citations). S. de Boer has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Cees Leijenhorst, B. Bohus, Paula Kersten, Paul J.J.M. Bakker, M.J. Bogaardt and Jolanda Lindenberg. Their work appears in journals such as Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, Distributed Computing and Journal of the history of philosophy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026