S. Daya

36 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

S. Daya
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
  • Biological Psychiatry 56
  • Insect Science 272
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 148
  • Aquatic Science 126
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 39
Replace Kousaku Ohinata with:
Kousaku Ohinata Japan
Takahiro Tsujita Japan
Aleksander Roberto Zampronio Brazil
K. N. S. Sirajudeen Malaysia
Cristina Torres‐Fuentes Spain
Kang Cheng China
Hans Fisher United States
Jocelijn Meijerink Netherlands
Subramanian S. Parvathy Kuwait
Patrícia Reckziegel Brazil
S. Daya relative to Kousaku Ohinata Japan Kousaku Ohinata's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
Kousaku Ohinata · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by S. Daya

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of S. Daya's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S. Daya with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S. Daya more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by S. Daya

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by S. Daya. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S. Daya. The network helps show where S. Daya may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside S. Daya, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with S. Daya Line = papers co-authored together S. Daya links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005171
2 2004164
3 2004162
4 200373
5 200646
6 199141
7 199036
8 200035
9 200034
10 200130
11 199827
12 200126
13 199024
14 198923
15 200523
16 200523
17 200620
18 200117
19 199714
20 198513

About S. Daya

S. Daya is a scholar working on Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Molecular Biology, Physiology, Biological Psychiatry and Pharmacology, having authored 37 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Circadian rhythm and melatonin (13 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (5 papers), Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (3 papers), Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (3 papers), Enzyme function and inhibition (3 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (3 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (2 papers) and Free Radicals and Antioxidants (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (56 citations), Insect Science (272 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (148 citations), Aquatic Science (126 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (39 citations). S. Daya has collaborated with scholars based in South Africa, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Fuliang Hu, Sarah E. Radloff, H. R. Hepburn, Deepa S. Maharaj, H Maharaj, Yinghua Li, Shailendra Anoopkumar‐Dukie, Horst Kaiser, T. Hecht and Niall Gordon Vine. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pineal Research, Life Sciences, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology and Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact