S. C. Kirkpatrick

709 total citations
27 papers, 531 citations indexed

About

S. C. Kirkpatrick is a scholar working on Cell Biology, Plant Science and Ecology. According to data from OpenAlex, S. C. Kirkpatrick has authored 27 papers receiving a total of 531 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 27 papers in Cell Biology, 23 papers in Plant Science and 6 papers in Ecology. Recurrent topics in S. C. Kirkpatrick's work include Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (27 papers), Plant Disease Management Techniques (10 papers) and Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (8 papers). S. C. Kirkpatrick is often cited by papers focused on Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (27 papers), Plant Disease Management Techniques (10 papers) and Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (8 papers). S. C. Kirkpatrick collaborates with scholars based in United States, Denmark and Spain. S. C. Kirkpatrick's co-authors include Thomas R. Gordon, S. T. Koike, Douglas V. Shaw, Ana M. Pastrana, B. J. Aegerter, Oleg Daugovish, Peter M. Henry, David L. Wood, Andrew J. Storer and Cassandra L. Swett and has published in prestigious journals such as Plant Disease, HortScience and Plant Pathology.

In The Last Decade

S. C. Kirkpatrick

27 papers receiving 506 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
S. C. Kirkpatrick United States 14 448 416 109 70 21 27 531
Georgina Elena Spain 11 310 0.7× 227 0.5× 94 0.9× 81 1.2× 13 0.6× 16 367
S. Castillo Venezuela 13 517 1.2× 460 1.1× 104 1.0× 144 2.1× 45 2.1× 33 606
Wubetu Bihon South Africa 12 325 0.7× 251 0.6× 124 1.1× 111 1.6× 21 1.0× 28 414
Cassandra L. Swett United States 13 261 0.6× 237 0.6× 90 0.8× 45 0.6× 45 2.1× 28 353
Megan Kennelly United States 13 591 1.3× 273 0.7× 87 0.8× 60 0.9× 16 0.8× 45 689
Monique L. Sakalidis United States 12 527 1.2× 522 1.3× 131 1.2× 222 3.2× 34 1.6× 32 638
Philip J. Keane Australia 13 349 0.8× 203 0.5× 59 0.5× 112 1.6× 22 1.0× 26 471
V. Lanoiselet Australia 11 337 0.8× 225 0.5× 38 0.3× 74 1.1× 11 0.5× 24 380
Chatchai Kosawang Denmark 9 260 0.6× 134 0.3× 80 0.7× 56 0.8× 41 2.0× 23 347
Nicholas LeBlanc United States 13 403 0.9× 291 0.7× 66 0.6× 124 1.8× 29 1.4× 26 486

Countries citing papers authored by S. C. Kirkpatrick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of S. C. Kirkpatrick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S. C. Kirkpatrick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S. C. Kirkpatrick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by S. C. Kirkpatrick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by S. C. Kirkpatrick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S. C. Kirkpatrick. The network helps show where S. C. Kirkpatrick may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of S. C. Kirkpatrick

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of S. C. Kirkpatrick. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of S. C. Kirkpatrick based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with S. C. Kirkpatrick. S. C. Kirkpatrick is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Gordon, Thomas R., G. Reynolds, S. C. Kirkpatrick, et al.. (2020). Monterey pine forest made a remarkable recovery from pitch canker. California Agriculture. 74(3). 169–173. 2 indexed citations
2.
Pastrana, Ana M., et al.. (2017). Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. mori, a New Forma Specialis Causing Fusarium Wilt of Blackberry. Plant Disease. 101(12). 2066–2072. 23 indexed citations
3.
Kirkpatrick, S. C., et al.. (2016). Inheritance of virulence in Fusarium circinatum , the cause of pitch canker in pines. Plant Pathology. 65(8). 1292–1296. 11 indexed citations
4.
Gordon, Thomas R., et al.. (2016). Options for Management of Fusarium Wilt of Strawberry in California. International Journal of Fruit Science. 16(sup1). 160–168. 14 indexed citations
5.
Yaghmour, Mohammad A., et al.. (2016). First Report of Fusarium brachygibbosum Causing Cankers in Cold-Stored, Bare-Root Propagated Almond Trees in California. Plant Disease. 101(2). 390–390. 13 indexed citations
6.
Gordon, Thomas R., et al.. (2015). First Report of a Wilt Disease of Blackberry Caused by Fusarium oxysporum in California. Plant Disease. 100(5). 1018–1018. 8 indexed citations
7.
Koike, S. T., Oleg Daugovish, S. C. Kirkpatrick, Peter M. Henry, & Thomas R. Gordon. (2015). First Report of Crown and Root Rot of Leek Caused by Fusarium avenaceum in California. Plant Disease. 99(12). 1864–1864. 3 indexed citations
8.
Gordon, Thomas R., S. C. Kirkpatrick, S. T. Koike, et al.. (2012). Crop rotation and genetic resistance reduce risk of damage from Fusarium wilt in lettuce. California Agriculture. 66(1). 20–24. 25 indexed citations
9.
Koike, S. T., Thomas R. Gordon, & S. C. Kirkpatrick. (2011). First Report of Fusarium Stem and Crown Rot of Fennel in Arizona Caused by Fusarium avenaceum. Plant Disease. 96(1). 145–145. 1 indexed citations
10.
Koike, S. T., S. C. Kirkpatrick, & Thomas R. Gordon. (2009). Fusarium Wilt of Strawberry Caused by Fusarium oxysporum in California. Plant Disease. 93(10). 1077–1077. 69 indexed citations
11.
12.
Kirkpatrick, S. C., et al.. (2009). Variation in susceptibility of lettuce cultivars to fusarium wilt caused by Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. lactucae. Plant Pathology. 59(1). 139–146. 37 indexed citations
13.
Shaw, Douglas V., et al.. (2008). Strawberry breeding improves genetic resistance to Verticillium wilt. California Agriculture. 64(1). 37–41. 7 indexed citations
14.
Desjardins, Anne E., et al.. (2007). Evidence for recombination and segregation of virulence to pine in a hybrid cross between Gibberella circinata and G. subglutinans. Mycological Research. 111(7). 827–831. 9 indexed citations
15.
Gordon, Thomas R., et al.. (2006). Potential diversity in vegetative compatibility groupings in the California population of Gibberella circinata. Mycological Research. 110(8). 936–940. 11 indexed citations
16.
Gordon, Thomas R., et al.. (2006). Response of strawberry genotypes to inoculation with isolates of Verticillium dahliae differing in host origin. Plant Pathology. 55(6). 766–769. 14 indexed citations
17.
Gordon, Thomas R., S. C. Kirkpatrick, B. J. Aegerter, David L. Wood, & Andrew J. Storer. (2006). Susceptibility of Douglas fir ( Pseudotsuga menziesii ) to pitch canker, caused by Gibberella circinata (anamorph =  Fusarium circinatum ). Plant Pathology. 55(2). 231–237. 38 indexed citations
18.
Shaw, Douglas V., Thomas R. Gordon, Kirk D. Larson, & S. C. Kirkpatrick. (2005). The Effect of Verticillium Infection in Runner Plant Propagation Nurseries on Resistant and Susceptible Strawberry Genotypes. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science. 130(5). 707–710. 7 indexed citations
19.
Gordon, Thomas R., et al.. (2004). First Report of the Pitch Canker Fungus (Fusarium circinatum) in the Sierra Nevada of California. Plant Disease. 88(7). 772–772. 14 indexed citations
20.
Gordon, Thomas R., S. C. Kirkpatrick, Douglas V. Shaw, & Kirk D. Larson. (2002). Differential Infection of Mother and Runner Plant Generations by Verticillium dahliae in a High Elevation Strawberry Nursery. HortScience. 37(6). 927–931. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Georgina Elena Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by S. Castillo Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Wubetu Bihon Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Cassandra L. Swett Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Megan Kennelly Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Monique L. Sakalidis Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Philip J. Keane Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by V. Lanoiselet Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Chatchai Kosawang Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Nicholas LeBlanc
Rankless by CCL
2026