S. Bosworth
- Topics
- Political Economy and Marxism (1 paper)
- Journals
- Current HistoryMedical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
S. Bosworth
1 paper receiving 2 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 3 of 3
- Political Science and International Relations 2
- Development 2
- Sociology and Political Science 1
Countries citing papers authored by S. Bosworth
This map shows the geographic impact of S. Bosworth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S. Bosworth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S. Bosworth more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by S. Bosworth
This network shows the impact of papers produced by S. Bosworth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S. Bosworth. The network helps show where S. Bosworth may publish in the future.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hegel's Political Philosophy: The Test Case of Constitutional Monarchy | 0 |
| 2 | 2 |
About S. Bosworth
S. Bosworth is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Infectious Diseases and Organic Chemistry, having authored 2 papers that have together received 2 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political Economy and Marxism (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Development (2 citations), Political Science and International Relations (2 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (1 citation). Their work appears in journals such as Current History and Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.