S. Austin

1.4k total citations
20 papers, 932 citations indexed

About

S. Austin is a scholar working on Plant Science, Molecular Biology and Cell Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, S. Austin has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 932 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Plant Science, 11 papers in Molecular Biology and 3 papers in Cell Biology. Recurrent topics in S. Austin's work include Plant Pathogens and Resistance (9 papers), Plant tissue culture and regeneration (8 papers) and Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics (5 papers). S. Austin is often cited by papers focused on Plant Pathogens and Resistance (9 papers), Plant tissue culture and regeneration (8 papers) and Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics (5 papers). S. Austin collaborates with scholars based in United States, Ireland and Canada. S. Austin's co-authors include John P. Helgeson, Geraldine T. Haberlach, Mark K. Ehlenfeldt, E. T. Bingham, Alan C. Cassells, Greg J. Hunt, Sigmund Schwimmer, Mark N. Shahan, Richard R. Burgess and Dennis E. Mathews and has published in prestigious journals such as Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Theoretical and Applied Genetics and Journal of Food Science.

In The Last Decade

S. Austin

20 papers receiving 850 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
S. Austin United States 14 818 469 244 109 100 20 932
S. S. Gosal India 16 670 0.8× 510 1.1× 60 0.2× 109 1.0× 73 0.7× 78 792
Geraldine T. Haberlach United States 14 1.1k 1.3× 317 0.7× 320 1.3× 36 0.3× 229 2.3× 16 1.1k
Kathy Swords United States 7 539 0.7× 328 0.7× 144 0.6× 59 0.5× 60 0.6× 9 660
S. M. Sun United States 6 359 0.4× 172 0.4× 172 0.7× 60 0.6× 23 0.2× 7 466
Helen E. Stewart Czechia 19 1.1k 1.3× 237 0.5× 382 1.6× 22 0.2× 190 1.9× 47 1.2k
J.J.M. Dons Netherlands 17 622 0.8× 631 1.3× 31 0.1× 192 1.8× 85 0.8× 35 809
Arun P. Aryan Australia 10 335 0.4× 296 0.6× 76 0.3× 175 1.6× 17 0.2× 14 525
María Teresa González-Arnao Mexico 11 410 0.5× 442 0.9× 64 0.3× 88 0.8× 23 0.2× 48 541
Jakob Reinert United States 8 628 0.8× 684 1.5× 53 0.2× 128 1.2× 68 0.7× 8 821
S. Roest Netherlands 18 692 0.8× 657 1.4× 177 0.7× 65 0.6× 65 0.7× 25 782

Countries citing papers authored by S. Austin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of S. Austin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S. Austin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S. Austin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by S. Austin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by S. Austin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S. Austin. The network helps show where S. Austin may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of S. Austin

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of S. Austin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of S. Austin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with S. Austin. S. Austin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Lim, Kenneth, Marie‐France Delisle, S. Austin, & R. Douglas Wilson. (2004). Cephalic Index Is Not a Useful Sonographic Marker for Trisomy 21 and Trisomy 18. Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy. 19(6). 491–495. 4 indexed citations
2.
Helgeson, John P., S. Austin, Geraldine T. Haberlach, et al.. (1998). Somatic hybrids between Solanum bulbocastanum and potato: a new source of resistance to late blight. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 96(6-7). 738–742. 135 indexed citations
3.
Austin, S.. (1998). Color in Garden Design. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 1 indexed citations
4.
Austin, S. & E. T. Bingham. (1997). The potential use of transgenic Alfalfa as a bioreactor for the production of industrial enzymes. 409–424. 4 indexed citations
5.
Austin, S., et al.. (1995). Improvement of transgenic alfalfa by backcrossing. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant. 31(4). 187–192. 22 indexed citations
6.
Austin, S., E. T. Bingham, Dennis E. Mathews, et al.. (1995). Production and field performance of transgenic alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) expressing alpha-amylase and manganese-dependent lignin peroxidase. Euphytica. 85(1-3). 381–393. 62 indexed citations
7.
Austin, S., E. T. Bingham, R. G. Koegel, et al.. (1994). An Overview of a Feasibility Study for the Production of Industrial Enzymes in Transgenic Alfalfaa. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 721(1). 234–244. 57 indexed citations
8.
Austin, S., C. R. Brown, H. Mojtahedi, et al.. (1993). Interspecific somatic hybridization betweenSolanum tuberosum L. andS. bulbocastanum dun. as a means of transferring nematode resistance. American Journal of Potato Research. 70(6). 485–495. 61 indexed citations
9.
Helgeson, John P., et al.. (1993). Sexual progeny of somatic hybrids between potato andSolanum brevidens: Potential for use in breeding programs. American Journal of Potato Research. 70(6). 437–452. 39 indexed citations
10.
Austin, S.. (1988). Fertile Interspecific Somatic Hybrids ofSolanum: A Novel Source of Resistance toErwiniaSoft Rot. Phytopathology. 78(9). 1216–1216. 110 indexed citations
11.
Helgeson, John P., et al.. (1988). Somatic fusions of Solanum species. Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC). 12(2). 185–187. 6 indexed citations
12.
Austin, S., et al.. (1986). Somatic hybrids produced by protoplast fusion between S. tuberosum and S. brevidens: phenotypic variation under field conditions. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 71(5). 682–690. 76 indexed citations
13.
Helgeson, John P., Greg J. Hunt, Geraldine T. Haberlach, & S. Austin. (1986). Somatic hybrids between Solanum brevidens and Solanum tuberosum: Expression of a late blight resistance gene and potato leaf roll resistance. Plant Cell Reports. 5(3). 212–214. 70 indexed citations
14.
Austin, S., et al.. (1985). Intra-specific fusions in Solanum tuberosum. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 71(2). 172–175. 49 indexed citations
15.
Austin, S., et al.. (1985). Transfer of resistance to potato leaf roll virus from Solanum brevidens into Solanum tuberosum by somatic fusion. Plant Science. 39(1). 75–81. 133 indexed citations
16.
Austin, S. & Alan C. Cassells. (1983). Variation between plants regenerated from individual calli produced from separated potato stem callus cells. Plant Science Letters. 31(1). 107–114. 35 indexed citations
17.
Cassells, Alan C., Eva M. Goetz, & S. Austin. (1983). Phenotypic variation in plants produced from lateral buds, stem explants and single-cell-derived callus of potato. Potato Research. 26(4). 367–372. 13 indexed citations
18.
Cassells, Alan C., et al.. (1980). Ethylene release during tobacco protoplast isolation and subsequent protoplast survival. Plant Science Letters. 19(2). 169–173. 16 indexed citations
19.
Schwimmer, Sigmund & S. Austin. (1971). GAMMA GLUTAMYL TRANSPEPTIDASE OF SPROUTED ONION. Journal of Food Science. 36(5). 807–811. 32 indexed citations
20.
Schwimmer, Sigmund & S. Austin. (1971). ENHANCEMENT OF PYRUVIC ACID RELEASE AND FLAVOR IN DEHYDRATED ALLIUM POWDERS BY GAMMA GLUTAMYL TRANSPEPTIDASES. Journal of Food Science. 36(7). 1081–1085. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026