E. T. Bingham

4.2k total citations
110 papers, 2.6k citations indexed

About

E. T. Bingham is a scholar working on Plant Science, Agronomy and Crop Science and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, E. T. Bingham has authored 110 papers receiving a total of 2.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 99 papers in Plant Science, 37 papers in Agronomy and Crop Science and 33 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in E. T. Bingham's work include Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology (36 papers), Plant Pathogens and Resistance (29 papers) and Bioenergy crop production and management (26 papers). E. T. Bingham is often cited by papers focused on Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology (36 papers), Plant Pathogens and Resistance (29 papers) and Bioenergy crop production and management (26 papers). E. T. Bingham collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and New Zealand. E. T. Bingham's co-authors include J. W. Saunders, R. W. Groose, D.R. Woodfield, T. J. McCoy, Bruce I. Reisch, K. K. Kidwell, T. W. Pfeiffer, W. D. Beversdorf, Nicholi Vorsa and S. Austin and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.

In The Last Decade

E. T. Bingham

107 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
E. T. Bingham United States 28 2.2k 1.4k 394 374 354 110 2.6k
Michael D. Gale United Kingdom 17 3.0k 1.4× 1.2k 0.8× 976 2.5× 427 1.1× 181 0.5× 26 3.3k
H. R. Boerma United States 43 5.2k 2.4× 1.2k 0.8× 402 1.0× 509 1.4× 197 0.6× 196 5.5k
Brian Watson United States 15 2.8k 1.2× 2.0k 1.4× 517 1.3× 195 0.5× 217 0.6× 18 3.3k
M. D. Gale United Kingdom 29 4.1k 1.8× 956 0.7× 1.7k 4.2× 496 1.3× 229 0.6× 48 4.3k
R. Appels Australia 26 1.9k 0.8× 439 0.3× 490 1.2× 194 0.5× 127 0.4× 53 2.1k
Glyn Jenkins United Kingdom 21 1.7k 0.8× 961 0.7× 307 0.8× 137 0.4× 403 1.1× 37 2.0k
E. R. Sears United States 26 3.7k 1.7× 1.0k 0.7× 864 2.2× 292 0.8× 168 0.5× 50 3.9k
D. T. Tomes United States 18 1.6k 0.7× 1.1k 0.8× 397 1.0× 149 0.4× 85 0.2× 37 1.9k
John E. Flintham United Kingdom 17 2.8k 1.3× 870 0.6× 687 1.7× 718 1.9× 71 0.2× 23 3.0k
K. Arumuganathan United States 28 4.3k 1.9× 2.3k 1.6× 909 2.3× 297 0.8× 798 2.3× 47 5.1k

Countries citing papers authored by E. T. Bingham

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. T. Bingham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. T. Bingham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. T. Bingham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. T. Bingham

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. T. Bingham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. T. Bingham. The network helps show where E. T. Bingham may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of E. T. Bingham

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of E. T. Bingham. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of E. T. Bingham based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with E. T. Bingham. E. T. Bingham is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Irwin, J. A. G. & E. T. Bingham. (2023). Review of Partial Hybrids between Herbaceous Medicago sativa and Woody Medicago arborea and Their Potential Role in Alfalfa Improvement. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2(3). 373–383.
3.
Tani, Eleni, Georgia Asimakopoulou, Maria Psychogiou, et al.. (2018). Seedling Growth and Transcriptional Responses to Salt Shock and Stress in Medicago sativa L., Medicago arborea L., and Their Hybrid (Alborea). Agronomy. 8(10). 231–231. 20 indexed citations
4.
Kimbeng, C. A. & E. T. Bingham. (1998). Population Improvement in Alfalfa: Fertility and S1 Forage Yield Performance in Original and Improved Populations. Crop Science. 38(6). 1509–1513. 15 indexed citations
5.
Woodfield, D.R. & E. T. Bingham. (1995). Improvement in Two‐Allele Autotetraploid Populations of Alfalfa Explained by Accumulation of Favorable Alleles. Crop Science. 35(4). 988–994. 28 indexed citations
6.
Austin, S., E. T. Bingham, R. G. Koegel, et al.. (1994). An Overview of a Feasibility Study for the Production of Industrial Enzymes in Transgenic Alfalfaa. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 721(1). 234–244. 57 indexed citations
7.
Kidwell, K. K., E. T. Bingham, D.R. Woodfield, & T. C. Osborn. (1994). Relationships among genetic distance, forage yield and heterozygosity in isogenic diploid and tetraploid alfalfa populations. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 89-89(2-3). 323–328. 26 indexed citations
8.
Bingham, E. T.. (1990). Backcrossing Tetraploidy into Diploid Medicago Falcata L. Using 2n Eggs. Crop Science. 30(6). 1353–1354. 14 indexed citations
9.
Talbert, L. E. & E. T. Bingham. (1989). Genetic Characterization of a Mutable Allele in Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Journal of Heredity. 80(5). 407–410. 4 indexed citations
10.
Veronesi, F., A. Mariani, & E. T. Bingham. (1986). Unreduced gametes in diploid Medicago and their importance in alfalfa breeding. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 72(1). 37–41. 53 indexed citations
11.
Groose, R. W. & E. T. Bingham. (1986). An unstable anthocyanin mutation recovered from tissue culture of alfalfa (Medicago sativa). Plant Cell Reports. 5(2). 104–107. 30 indexed citations
12.
Groose, R. W. & E. T. Bingham. (1986). An unstable anthocyanin mutation recovered from tissue culture of alfalfa (Medicago sativa). Plant Cell Reports. 5(2). 108–110. 14 indexed citations
13.
Pfeiffer, T. W. & E. T. Bingham. (1984). Comparisons of alfalfa somaclonal and sexual derivatives from the same genetic source. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 67(2-3). 263–266. 5 indexed citations
14.
Reisch, Bruce I., Stanley H. Duke, & E. T. Bingham. (1981). Selection and characterization of ethionine-resistant alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) cell lines. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 59(2). 89–94. 28 indexed citations
15.
Brill, Winston J., et al.. (1980). Effect of Alfalfa Ploidy on Nitrogen Fixation1. Crop Science. 20(4). 427–430. 19 indexed citations
16.
Bingham, E. T., et al.. (1979). Dry Matter and Morphological Responses to Temperatures of Alfalfa Strains with Differing Ploidy Levels1. Agronomy Journal. 71(4). 573–577. 7 indexed citations
17.
Bingham, E. T., et al.. (1975). Maximum Heterozygosity in Alfalfa: Results Using Haploid‐derived Autoteraploids1. Crop Science. 15(4). 527–531. 32 indexed citations
18.
Bingham, E. T., et al.. (1973). Inbreeding Cultivated Alfalfa in One Tetraploid‐Haploid‐Tetraploid Cycle: Effects on Morphology, Fertility, and Cytology1. Crop Science. 13(1). 36–39. 10 indexed citations
19.
Bingham, E. T., et al.. (1971). PACHYTENE KARYOTYPES OF 2XHAPLOIDS DERIVED FROM TETRAPLOID ALFALFA (MEDICAGO SATIVA) — EVIDENCE FOR AUTOTETRAPLOIDY. Canadian Journal of Genetics and Cytology. 13(3). 397–403. 5 indexed citations
20.
Bingham, E. T., et al.. (1968). DOUBLE AND SINGLE BACKCROSS LINKAGE ESTIMATES IN AUTOTETRAPLOID MAIZE. Genetics. 59(3). 399–410. 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026