S. Antier

43.2k total citations
18 papers, 301 citations indexed

About

S. Antier is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Instrumentation. According to data from OpenAlex, S. Antier has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 301 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 7 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics and 1 paper in Instrumentation. Recurrent topics in S. Antier's work include Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (15 papers), Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (12 papers) and Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (8 papers). S. Antier is often cited by papers focused on Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (15 papers), Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (12 papers) and Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (8 papers). S. Antier collaborates with scholars based in France, United States and Sweden. S. Antier's co-authors include M. W. Coughlin, Tim Dietrich, Mattia Bulla, François Foucart, S. Nissanke, G. Raaijmakers, Kenta Hotokezaka, Tanja Hinderer, Philippe Laurent and D. Götz and has published in prestigious journals such as The Astrophysical Journal, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society and Physical review. D.

In The Last Decade

S. Antier

15 papers receiving 284 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
S. Antier France 9 281 113 19 16 15 18 301
S. Katsanevas France 6 144 0.5× 94 0.8× 20 1.1× 13 0.8× 7 0.5× 19 208
T. Sasseen United States 12 327 1.2× 134 1.2× 25 1.3× 4 0.3× 5 0.3× 17 339
I. Andruchow Argentina 10 280 1.0× 230 2.0× 30 1.6× 8 0.5× 3 0.2× 27 318
D. Svinkin Russia 11 374 1.3× 134 1.2× 13 0.7× 4 0.3× 9 0.6× 47 385
Ildar Khabibullin Germany 12 354 1.3× 165 1.5× 34 1.8× 7 0.4× 4 0.3× 57 384
Deron O. Pease United States 7 278 1.0× 127 1.1× 35 1.8× 4 0.3× 3 0.2× 14 289
K. Jani United States 6 289 1.0× 65 0.6× 32 1.7× 7 0.4× 14 302
Kenzie Nimmo Netherlands 11 278 1.0× 66 0.6× 34 1.8× 11 0.7× 18 293
P. Sizun France 9 289 1.0× 246 2.2× 18 0.9× 7 0.4× 23 1.5× 22 350
E. Koerding United Kingdom 8 568 2.0× 273 2.4× 38 2.0× 3 0.2× 12 0.8× 11 579

Countries citing papers authored by S. Antier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of S. Antier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S. Antier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S. Antier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by S. Antier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by S. Antier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S. Antier. The network helps show where S. Antier may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of S. Antier

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of S. Antier. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of S. Antier based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with S. Antier. S. Antier is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
1.
Toivonen, Andrew, Sushant Sharma Chaudhary, S. Antier, et al.. (2025). What to Expect: Kilonova Light Curve Predictions via Equation of State Marginalization. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific. 137(3). 34506–34506.
2.
Duverne, Pierre-Alexandre, T. Dal Canton, S. Antier, et al.. (2024). Optimizing the low-latency localization of gravitational waves. Physical review. D. 110(10).
3.
Antier, S., Vsevolod Nedora, Mattia Bulla, et al.. (2023). Bayesian model selection for GRB 211211A through multiwavelength analyses. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 527(2). 3900–3911. 7 indexed citations
4.
Drago, M., S. Antier, S. Basa, et al.. (2022). MUPHOTEN: A MUlti-band PHOtometry Tool for TElescope Network. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific. 134(1041). 114504–114504.
5.
Raaijmakers, G., S. Nissanke, François Foucart, et al.. (2021). The Challenges Ahead for Multimessenger Analyses of Gravitational Waves and Kilonova: A Case Study on GW190425. The Astrophysical Journal. 922(2). 269–269. 43 indexed citations
6.
Heinzel, J., M. W. Coughlin, Tim Dietrich, et al.. (2021). Comparing inclination-dependent analyses of kilonova transients. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 502(2). 3057–3065. 37 indexed citations
7.
Almualla, Mouza, Shreya Anand, M. W. Coughlin, et al.. (2021). Optimizing serendipitous detections of kilonovae: cadence and filter selection. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 504(2). 2822–2831. 15 indexed citations
8.
Stachie, C., M. W. Coughlin, Tim Dietrich, et al.. (2021). Predicting electromagnetic counterparts using low-latency gravitational-wave data products. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 505(3). 4235–4248. 10 indexed citations
9.
Antier, S.. (2020). Multi-messenger astrophysics and the GRANDMA generation. Nature Reviews Physics. 2(9). 449–451. 1 indexed citations
10.
Turpin, D., S. Antier, E. Bertin, et al.. (2020). Vetting the optical transient candidates detected by the GWAC network using convolutional neural networks. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 497(3). 2641–2650. 17 indexed citations
11.
Coughlin, M. W., Tim Dietrich, S. Antier, et al.. (2020). Implications of the search for optical counterparts during the second part of the Advanced LIGO’s and Advanced Virgo’s third observing run: lessons learned for future follow-up observations. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 497(1). 1181–1196. 34 indexed citations
12.
Schanne, S., N. Dagoneau, F. Château, et al.. (2019). The SVOM ECLAIRs gamma-ray burst trigger. Memorie della Societa Astronomica Italiana. 90. 267. 2 indexed citations
13.
Coughlin, M. W., S. Antier, D. Corre, et al.. (2019). Optimizing multitelescope observations of gravitational-wave counterparts. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 489(4). 5775–5783. 23 indexed citations
14.
Coughlin, M. W., Tim Dietrich, S. Antier, et al.. (2019). Implications of the search for optical counterparts during the first six months of the Advanced LIGO’s and Advanced Virgo’s third observing run: possible limits on the ejecta mass and binary properties. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 492(1). 863–876. 49 indexed citations
15.
Bernardini, M. G., Fei Xie, P. Sizun, et al.. (2017). Scientific prospects for spectroscopy of the gamma-ray burst prompt emission with SVOM. Experimental Astronomy. 44(1). 113–127. 7 indexed citations
16.
Antier, S., P. Ferrando, O. Limousin, et al.. (2015). Hard X-ray polarimetry with Caliste, a high performance CdTe based imaging spectrometer. Experimental Astronomy. 39(2). 233–258. 8 indexed citations
17.
Antier, S., O. Limousin, & P. Ferrando. (2015). Fine pitch CdTe-based hard-X-ray polarimeter performance for space science in the 70–300 keV energy range. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 787. 297–301. 3 indexed citations
18.
Götz, D., Philippe Laurent, S. Antier, et al.. (2014). GRB 140206A: the most distant polarized gamma-ray burst. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 444(3). 2776–2782. 45 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026