Ryo Oyama
- Atmospheric Science top 1%
- Global and Planetary Change top 1%
- Oceanography top 2%
- Water Science and Technology top 10%
- Environmental Engineering
- Co-authors
- Junichi TsutsuiKiyotoshi TakahashiMasami SakamotoHiroaki HatsushikaHirotaka KamahoriKoji KatoShinji KadokuraTomoaki Ose
- Topics
- Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research (11 papers)Climate variability and models (11 papers)Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations (9 papers)
- Journals
- Monthly Weather ReviewQuarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological SocietyJournal of the European Ceramic Society
- Partner nations
- JapanUnited States
In The Last Decade
Ryo Oyama
14 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
- Atmospheric Science 1.4k
- Global and Planetary Change 1.3k
- Oceanography 442
- Water Science and Technology 81
- Environmental Engineering 62
Countries citing papers authored by Ryo Oyama
This map shows the geographic impact of Ryo Oyama's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ryo Oyama with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ryo Oyama more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ryo Oyama
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ryo Oyama. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ryo Oyama. The network helps show where Ryo Oyama may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ryo Oyama
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ryo Oyama. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ryo Oyama based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ryo Oyama. Ryo Oyama is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | 13 | |
| 5 | 23 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 12 | |
| 8 | 15 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | Summary and Characteristics of Approaching and Landfalling Tropical Cyclones in Japan in 2012 and 2013 | 1 |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | The JRA-25 Reanalysisbreakdown → | 1374 |
| 13 | 93 | |
| 14 | 6 |
About Ryo Oyama
Ryo Oyama is a scholar working on Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change and Oceanography, having authored 14 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research (11 papers), Climate variability and models (11 papers) and Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atmospheric Science (1.4k citations), Global and Planetary Change (1.3k citations) and Oceanography (442 citations). Ryo Oyama has collaborated with scholars based in Japan and United States. Frequent co-authors include Junichi Tsutsui, Kiyotoshi Takahashi, Masami Sakamoto, Hiroaki Hatsushika, Hirotaka Kamahori, Koji Kato, Shinji Kadokura, Tomoaki Ose, Koji Wada and Kazutoshi Onogi. Their work appears in journals such as Monthly Weather Review, Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society and Journal of the European Ceramic Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.