Ryan Spellecy

405 total citations
23 papers, 184 citations indexed

About

Ryan Spellecy is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Physiology. According to data from OpenAlex, Ryan Spellecy has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 184 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in General Health Professions, 14 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 4 papers in Physiology. Recurrent topics in Ryan Spellecy's work include Ethics in Clinical Research (9 papers), Ethics in medical practice (7 papers) and Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (4 papers). Ryan Spellecy is often cited by papers focused on Ethics in Clinical Research (9 papers), Ethics in medical practice (7 papers) and Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (4 papers). Ryan Spellecy collaborates with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and United Kingdom. Ryan Spellecy's co-authors include Anita D’Souza, Marcelo C. Pasquini, Thomas May, Anna Palatnik, Iris D. Gersten, Ellen M. Denzen, Heather Moore, Amy Foley, Navneet S. Majhail and Mary M. Horowitz and has published in prestigious journals such as Obstetrics and Gynecology, Academic Medicine and Bone Marrow Transplantation.

In The Last Decade

Ryan Spellecy

21 papers receiving 180 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ryan Spellecy United States 8 106 84 34 19 15 23 184
Niki M. Medendorp Netherlands 9 83 0.8× 100 1.2× 35 1.0× 14 0.7× 4 0.3× 15 258
Inez de Beaufort Netherlands 10 125 1.2× 60 0.7× 87 2.6× 25 1.3× 32 2.1× 28 298
Sjef Gevers Netherlands 10 154 1.5× 45 0.5× 29 0.9× 42 2.2× 39 2.6× 26 246
Andrew McGee Australia 9 139 1.3× 49 0.6× 20 0.6× 41 2.2× 12 0.8× 58 259
Jyotsna Gupta India 10 60 0.6× 27 0.3× 67 2.0× 24 1.3× 20 1.3× 24 320
Margaret Navarro Canada 4 65 0.6× 34 0.4× 69 2.0× 21 1.1× 4 0.3× 5 192
Virginia Sanchini Italy 9 118 1.1× 107 1.3× 29 0.9× 11 0.6× 18 1.2× 25 203
Kristof Van Assche Belgium 14 326 3.1× 49 0.6× 39 1.1× 87 4.6× 37 2.5× 44 411
Jeanne Reeve New Zealand 8 51 0.5× 41 0.5× 23 0.7× 13 0.7× 7 0.5× 11 209
Penny Kyler United States 8 130 1.2× 86 1.0× 141 4.1× 12 0.6× 34 2.3× 9 455

Countries citing papers authored by Ryan Spellecy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ryan Spellecy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ryan Spellecy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ryan Spellecy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ryan Spellecy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ryan Spellecy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ryan Spellecy. The network helps show where Ryan Spellecy may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ryan Spellecy

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ryan Spellecy. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ryan Spellecy based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ryan Spellecy. Ryan Spellecy is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Jotterand, Fabrice, et al.. (2024). Practical Wisdom, Clinical Judgments, and the Agential View. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine. 50(2). 147–158. 2 indexed citations
2.
Franco, Zeno, Christopher S. Davis, Adina Kalet, et al.. (2023). Medical School Civic Engagement During COVID-19: Activating Institutions for Equitable Community Response. Journal of Humanistic Psychology.
3.
Cusatis, Rachel, et al.. (2022). Navigating the perils and pitfalls throughout the consent process in hematopoietic cell transplantation. Blood Reviews. 59. 101037–101037. 4 indexed citations
4.
Jotterand, Fabrice, et al.. (2022). Promoting Equity in Health Care through Human Flourishing, Justice, and Solidarity. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine. 48(1). 98–109. 4 indexed citations
5.
Williams, Vesper, et al.. (2022). Pupillary Dilation in Research: More than Meets the Eye. Current Eye Research. 47(7). 965–977. 1 indexed citations
6.
May, Thomas, et al.. (2021). Community-Based Participatory Research and its Potential Role in Supporting Diversity in Genomic Science. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved. 32(3). 1208–1224. 7 indexed citations
7.
Carroll, Joseph, et al.. (2020). Characterizing Current Attitudes and Practices for Human Subject Safety in Studies Involving Pupil Dilation. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics. 16(1-2). 54–64. 1 indexed citations
8.
Spellecy, Ryan, et al.. (2019). Bias in the Peer Review Process. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 133(6). 1081–1083. 15 indexed citations
9.
Spellecy, Ryan, Sergey Tarima, Ellen M. Denzen, et al.. (2018). Easy-to-Read Informed Consent Form for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Clinical Trials: Results from the Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network 1205 Study. Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation. 24(10). 2145–2151. 13 indexed citations
10.
Spellecy, Ryan, et al.. (2018). The Real-Time IRB: A Collaborative Innovation to Decrease IRB Review Time. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics. 13(4). 432–437. 10 indexed citations
11.
Solomon, Stephanie, Karen S. Calhoun, Lori E. Crosby, et al.. (2014). Piloting a Nationally Disseminated, Interactive Human Subjects Protection Program for Community Partners: Unexpected Lessons Learned from the Field. Clinical and Translational Science. 7(2). 172–176. 2 indexed citations
12.
D’Souza, Anita, Marcelo C. Pasquini, & Ryan Spellecy. (2014). Is ‘informed consent’ an ‘understood consent’ in hematopoietic cell transplantation?. Bone Marrow Transplantation. 50(1). 10–14. 27 indexed citations
13.
May, Thomas, et al.. (2014). The Limits of Traditional Approaches to Informed Consent for Genomic Medicine. HEC Forum. 26(3). 185–202. 5 indexed citations
14.
Spellecy, Ryan & Thomas May. (2012). More Than Cheating: Deception, IRB Shopping, and the Normative Legitimacy of IRBs. The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics. 40(4). 990–996. 5 indexed citations
15.
Denzen, Ellen M., Heather Moore, Amy Foley, et al.. (2011). Easy-to-Read Informed Consent Forms for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Clinical Trials. Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation. 18(2). 183–189. 25 indexed citations
16.
Hoop, Jinger G. & Ryan Spellecy. (2009). Philosophical and Ethical Issues at the Forefront of Neuroscience and Genetics: An Overview for Psychiatrists. Psychiatric Clinics of North America. 32(2). 437–449. 3 indexed citations
17.
Spellecy, Ryan, L. Eugene Arnold, & Thomas May. (2008). Children and Parents as Members of the Research Team: Fair Employment Practices Without a Union Contract. Ethics & Behavior. 18(2-3). 199–214. 1 indexed citations
18.
May, Thomas, et al.. (2007). Viewpoint: IRBs, Hospital Ethics Committees, and the Need for ???Translational Informed Consent???. Academic Medicine. 82(7). 670–674. 11 indexed citations
19.
May, Thomas & Ryan Spellecy. (2006). Autonomy, Full Information, and Genetic Ignorance in Reproductive Medicine. The Monist. 89(4). 466–481. 4 indexed citations
20.
Spellecy, Ryan. (2003). Reviving Ulysses Contracts. Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal. 13(4). 373–392. 32 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Niki M. Medendorp Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Inez de Beaufort Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sjef Gevers Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Andrew McGee Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jyotsna Gupta Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Margaret Navarro Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Virginia Sanchini Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Kristof Van Assche Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jeanne Reeve Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Penny Kyler
Rankless by CCL
2026