Ruth Reeves

664 total citations
10 papers, 438 citations indexed

About

Ruth Reeves is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Language and Linguistics and Literature and Literary Theory. According to data from OpenAlex, Ruth Reeves has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 438 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Artificial Intelligence, 5 papers in Language and Linguistics and 1 paper in Literature and Literary Theory. Recurrent topics in Ruth Reeves's work include Natural Language Processing Techniques (6 papers), Lexicography and Language Studies (3 papers) and Topic Modeling (3 papers). Ruth Reeves is often cited by papers focused on Natural Language Processing Techniques (6 papers), Lexicography and Language Studies (3 papers) and Topic Modeling (3 papers). Ruth Reeves collaborates with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and China. Ruth Reeves's co-authors include Adam Meyers, Catherine Macleod, Ralph Grishman, Rachel Szekely, Brian Young and Roman Yangarber and has published in prestigious journals such as Language Resources and Evaluation, North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics and Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.

In The Last Decade

Ruth Reeves

9 papers receiving 388 citations

Peers

Ruth Reeves
Comparison fields: 5 of 29
  • Artificial Intelligence 421
  • Molecular Biology 41
  • Language and Linguistics 41
  • Information Systems 27
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 15
Replace Guido Minnen with:
Guido Minnen Germany
Atanas Chanev Sweden
Svetoslav Marinov Sweden
Katri Haverinen Finland
António Branco Portugal
Wojciech Skut Germany
Joseph Rosenzweig United States
Wolfgang Lezius Germany
Harald Trost Austria
Vladislav Kuboň Czechia
Guido Minnen Germany View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Ruth Reeves
Ruth Reeves · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Ruth Reeves
Ruth Reeves · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Reeves

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Reeves's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Reeves with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Reeves more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth Reeves

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Reeves. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Reeves. The network helps show where Ruth Reeves may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ruth Reeves

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ruth Reeves. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ruth Reeves based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ruth Reeves. Ruth Reeves is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1
The Cross-Breeding of Dictionaries
25
2
Annotating Noun Argument Structure for NomBank
72
3
The NomBank Project: An Interim Report
203
4 15
5
Using NOMLEX to Produce Nominalization Patterns for Information Extraction
25
6
NOMLEX: a lexicon of nominalizations
91
7 3
8 1
9 2
10 1

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026