Ruth Reeves

22 papers receiving 311 citations

Peers

Ruth Reeves
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Health Informatics 26
  • Health Information Management 43
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 7
  • Artificial Intelligence 99
  • Family Practice 5
Replace Ehsan Ullah with:
Ehsan Ullah Qatar
Worrawat Engchuan Canada
Wenyu Song United States
Scott Kaplin United States
Brihat Sharma United States
Elisa Salvi Italy
Clair Blacketer United States
Sina Rashidian United States
Yikang Wang China
Ruth Reeves relative to Ehsan Ullah Qatar Ehsan Ullah's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Ehsan Ullah · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Reeves

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Reeves's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Reeves with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Reeves more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth Reeves

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Reeves. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Reeves. The network helps show where Ruth Reeves may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ruth Reeves, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ruth Reeves Line = papers co-authored together Ruth Reeves links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201370
2 201429
3 201828
4 202127
5 201225
6 200323
7 200320
8 201319
9 200413
10 200412
11 19988
12 20048
13 20227
14 20186
15 20206
16 20206
17
Normalizing Clinical Document Titles to LOINC Document Ontology: an Initial Study.
20204
18 20233
19
Who said it? Establishing professional attribution among authors of Veterans' Electronic Health Records.
20122
20
Annotating Social Determinants of Health and Functional Status Information Using Publicly Accessible Corpora.
20181

About Ruth Reeves

Ruth Reeves is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Health Information Management and Social Psychology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 319 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (6 papers), Electronic Health Records Systems (4 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (4 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (4 papers), Machine Learning in Healthcare (4 papers), Topic Modeling (4 papers), Mental Health via Writing (3 papers) and Natural Language Processing Techniques (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (26 citations), Health Information Management (43 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (7 citations), Artificial Intelligence (99 citations) and Family Practice (5 citations). Ruth Reeves has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Michael E. Matheny, Mona Thiruchelvam, Deborah A. Cory‐Slechta, Theodore Speroff, Steven H. Brown, Glenn T. Gobbel, Eric K. Richfield, Dominik Aronsky, Peter L. Elkin and Fern FitzHenry. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biomedical Informatics, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, International Journal of Medical Informatics, BMJ Open and Brain Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact