Ruth McCracken

3.8k citations
28 papers · 3.1k indexed · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

Ruth McCracken

28 papers receiving 3.1k citations

Peers

Ruth McCracken
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
  • Nephrology 879
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 385
  • Molecular Biology 1.3k
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 280
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 376
Replace W. Woloszczuk with:
W. Woloszczuk Austria
Wolfgang Schneider Germany
Marie‐Christine de Vernejoul France
Atsushi Shioi Japan
Ryo Okazaki Japan
Takahito Ito Japan
John L. Fowlkes United States
Rosemary Bland United Kingdom
Hou‐De Zhou China
H. Schmidt‐Gayk Germany
Ruth McCracken relative to W. Woloszczuk Austria W. Woloszczuk's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
W. Woloszczuk · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ruth McCracken

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth McCracken's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth McCracken with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth McCracken more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth McCracken

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth McCracken. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth McCracken. The network helps show where Ruth McCracken may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ruth McCracken, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ruth McCracken Line = papers co-authored together Ruth McCracken links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 201410
2 2008139
3 200332
4 2002130
5 2001136
6 200030
7 1999124
8 199820
9 1996124
10
Control of p53 and p21 (WAF1) expression during unilateral ureteral obstruction.
199627
11 199562
12 1995283
13 1994194
14 1994170
15 199254
16 199229
17 199164
18 1991460
19 199025
20 198010

About Ruth McCracken

Ruth McCracken is a scholar working on Nephrology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Urology, Toxicology and Biochemistry, having authored 28 papers that have together received 3.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments (9 papers), Acute Kidney Injury Research (7 papers), Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes (5 papers), Ureteral procedures and complications (5 papers), Bone Metabolism and Diseases (3 papers), Renal and Vascular Pathologies (3 papers), Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies (3 papers) and Bone health and osteoporosis research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nephrology (879 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (385 citations), Molecular Biology (1.3k citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (280 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (376 citations). Ruth McCracken has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Jeremiah J. Morrissey, Saulo Klahr, Shigeto Ishidoya, Louis V. Avioli, Robert E. Pacifici, Álvaro Reyes, Leonard Rifas, Hiroyuki Kaneto, Guangjie Guo and Timothy Tolley. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology, Kidney International, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Journal of Clinical Investigation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026