Ruth Mace

15.1k total citations · 1 hit paper
183 papers, 8.7k citations indexed

About

Ruth Mace is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Gender Studies. According to data from OpenAlex, Ruth Mace has authored 183 papers receiving a total of 8.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 79 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 65 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 58 papers in Gender Studies. Recurrent topics in Ruth Mace's work include Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (66 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (62 papers) and Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences (58 papers). Ruth Mace is often cited by papers focused on Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (66 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (62 papers) and Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences (58 papers). Ruth Mace collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, China and United States. Ruth Mace's co-authors include Rebecca Sear, Clare Holden, Mhairi A. Gibson, David W. Lawson, Ian A. McGregor, Thomas E. Currie, Mark Pagel, Shakti Lamba, Andrea Bamberg Migliano and Alasdair I. Houston and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Science and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

In The Last Decade

Ruth Mace

178 papers receiving 8.2k citations

Hit Papers

Who keeps children alive? A review of the effects of kin ... 2007 2026 2013 2019 2007 200 400 600

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ruth Mace United Kingdom 53 3.1k 2.8k 1.9k 1.4k 1.3k 183 8.7k
Daniel Nettle United Kingdom 61 3.6k 1.2× 4.1k 1.5× 933 0.5× 3.1k 2.3× 786 0.6× 241 13.0k
Hillard Kaplan United States 70 4.0k 1.3× 5.2k 1.9× 1.5k 0.8× 3.3k 2.4× 1.2k 0.9× 289 17.1k
Kim Hill United States 49 4.2k 1.4× 4.6k 1.6× 914 0.5× 3.3k 2.4× 823 0.6× 132 11.9k
Michael Gurven United States 61 5.5k 1.8× 5.1k 1.8× 807 0.4× 3.4k 2.5× 1.3k 1.0× 224 14.1k
Monique Borgerhoff Mulder United States 46 2.1k 0.7× 1.7k 0.6× 989 0.5× 930 0.7× 721 0.5× 141 5.9k
Kristen Hawkes United States 44 2.1k 0.7× 2.9k 1.1× 593 0.3× 2.4k 1.8× 384 0.3× 104 8.7k
Frank W. Marlowe United States 50 4.1k 1.3× 3.9k 1.4× 650 0.3× 2.6k 1.9× 936 0.7× 83 11.0k
Martin Daly Canada 47 5.3k 1.7× 3.7k 1.3× 2.0k 1.0× 2.0k 1.5× 912 0.7× 173 10.9k
Robert Trivers United States 34 5.9k 1.9× 3.8k 1.3× 1.6k 0.8× 3.3k 2.4× 729 0.6× 67 17.4k
David Rowe United States 58 4.5k 1.4× 3.3k 1.2× 2.4k 1.3× 1.5k 1.1× 814 0.6× 302 11.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Mace

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Mace's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Mace with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Mace more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth Mace

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Mace. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Mace. The network helps show where Ruth Mace may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ruth Mace

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ruth Mace. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ruth Mace based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ruth Mace. Ruth Mace is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Campbell, Olympia L K, et al.. (2025). Skewed sex ratios and violence against women in Pakistan. Evolutionary Human Sciences. 7. e18–e18.
2.
Mace, Ruth. (2025). Human behavioural ecology is cultural ecology. Evolution and Human Behavior. 46(6). 106744–106744.
3.
Mace, Ruth, et al.. (2024). Religiosity and gender bias structure social networks. Evolutionary Human Sciences. 6. e23–e23. 1 indexed citations
4.
Mace, Ruth, et al.. (2024). Alcohol consumption, life history and extinction risk among Raute hunter–gatherers from Nepal. Evolutionary Human Sciences. 6. e45–e45. 1 indexed citations
5.
He, Qiao-Qiao, Jieru Yu, Songhua Tang, et al.. (2024). Jeans and language: kin networks and reproductive success are associated with the adoption of outgroup norms. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 379(1897). 20230031–20230031. 5 indexed citations
6.
Brandl, Eva, Emily H Emmott, & Ruth Mace. (2023). Development of teaching in ni-Vanuatu children. Child Development. 94(6). 1713–1729. 2 indexed citations
7.
He, Qiao-Qiao, et al.. (2022). Communal breeding by women is associated with lower investment from husbands. Evolutionary Human Sciences. 4. e50–e50. 8 indexed citations
8.
Emmott, Emily H & Ruth Mace. (2020). Why the Son-bias in Caregiving? Testing Sex-differences in the Associations Between Paternal Caregiving and Child Outcomes in England. Journal of Family Issues. 42(6). 1354–1383. 9 indexed citations
9.
Page, Abigail E., Daniel Major‐Smith, Mark Dyble, et al.. (2019). Testing adaptive hypotheses of alloparenting in Agta foragers. Nature Human Behaviour. 3(11). 1154–1163. 41 indexed citations
10.
Mace, Ruth, et al.. (2018). Population structured by witchcraft beliefs. Nature Human Behaviour. 2(1). 39–44. 21 indexed citations
11.
Montalva, Nicolás, Kaustubh Adhikari, Anke Liebert, et al.. (2018). Adaptation to milking agropastoralism in Chilean goat herders and nutritional benefit of lactase persistence. Annals of Human Genetics. 83(1). 11–22. 7 indexed citations
12.
Migliano, Andrea Bamberg, Abigail E. Page, Jesús Gómez‐Gardeñes, et al.. (2017). Characterization of hunter-gatherer networks and implications for cumulative culture. Nature Human Behaviour. 1(2). 90 indexed citations
13.
Gurmu, Eshetu & Ruth Mace. (2013). Determinants of Age at First Marriage in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Journal of Social Development in Africa. 28(1). 87–109. 2 indexed citations
14.
Alvergne, Alexandra, Mhairi A. Gibson, Eshetu Gurmu, & Ruth Mace. (2011). Social Transmission and the Spread of Modern Contraception in Rural Ethiopia. PLoS ONE. 6(7). e22515–e22515. 48 indexed citations
15.
Bentley, Gillian R. & Ruth Mace. (2009). Substitute parents: Biological and social perspectives on alloparenting across human societies. UCL Discovery (University College London). 17 indexed citations
16.
Jordan, Fiona M., Russell D. Gray, Simon J. Greenhill, & Ruth Mace. (2009). Matrilocal residence is ancestral in Austronesian societies. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 276(1664). 1957–1964. 134 indexed citations
17.
Holden, Clare & Ruth Mace. (2009). Phylogenetic Analysis of the Evolution of Lactose Digestion in Adults. Human Biology. 81(5-6). 597–619. 52 indexed citations
18.
Sear, Rebecca & Ruth Mace. (2007). Who keeps children alive? A review of the effects of kin on child survival. Evolution and Human Behavior. 29(1). 1–18. 674 indexed citations breakdown →
19.
Mace, Ruth, et al.. (1997). Fertility and model of subsistence: A phylogenetic analysis. UCL Discovery (University College London). 1 indexed citations
20.
Mace, Ruth & Mark Pagel. (1994). THE COMPARATIVE METHOD IN ANTHROPOLOGY. UCL Discovery (University College London). 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026