Ruth M. Shepherd
- Surgery top 5%
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism top 2%
- Molecular Biology
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 10%
- Genetics top 10%
- Co-authors
- Mark J. DunneKeith LindleyA Aynsley‐GreenKaren E. CosgrovePeter J. MillaCharlotte KanePaul JohnsonRoger F.L. James
- Topics
- Pancreatic function and diabetes (16 papers)Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients (12 papers)Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesIsrael
In The Last Decade
Ruth M. Shepherd
28 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
- Surgery 702
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 687
- Molecular Biology 607
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 203
- Genetics 194
Countries citing papers authored by Ruth M. Shepherd
This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth M. Shepherd's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth M. Shepherd with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth M. Shepherd more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth M. Shepherd
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth M. Shepherd. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth M. Shepherd. The network helps show where Ruth M. Shepherd may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ruth M. Shepherd
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ruth M. Shepherd. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ruth M. Shepherd based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ruth M. Shepherd. Ruth M. Shepherd is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | How many Trinidad stream frogs (Mannophryne trinitatis) are there, and should they be regarded as vulnerable to extinction? | 1 |
| 3 | 40 | |
| 4 | 49 | |
| 5 | 16 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 30 | |
| 8 | 245 | |
| 9 | 50 | |
| 10 | 29 | |
| 11 | 181 | |
| 12 | 42 | |
| 13 | 185 | |
| 14 | 38 | |
| 15 | Aspects biophysiques du contrôle de la sécrétion d'insuline. | 1 |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 5 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 6 | |
| 20 | 14 |
About Ruth M. Shepherd
Ruth M. Shepherd is a scholar working on Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Surgery and Ecological Modeling, having authored 29 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pancreatic function and diabetes (16 papers), Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients (12 papers) and Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (687 citations), Sensory Systems (146 citations) and Surgery (702 citations). Ruth M. Shepherd has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Mark J. Dunne, Keith Lindley, A Aynsley‐Green, Karen E. Cosgrove, Peter J. Milla, Charlotte Kane, Paul Johnson, Roger F.L. James, Paul E. Squires and Jean‐Claude Henquin. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Nature Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.