Ruth M. Fischer
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems top 10%
- Circadian rhythm and melatonin 1
-
- Photoreceptor and optogenetics research 2
- Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research 2
-
- Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance 1
- Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity 1
- Plant Molecular Biology Research 1
-
- Retinal Development and Disorders 3
-
- Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications 3
- Co-authors
- Kristin Tessmar‐RaibleKlaus ApelDorothee StaigerChristian HeintzenStefan KappelerSiegbert MelzerMaximilian HofbauerPeter G. Higgins
- Cited by
- Endocrine and Autonomic SystemsCellular and Molecular NeuroscienceEcology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Partner nations
- AustriaGermanyUnited States
In The Last Decade
Ruth M. Fischer
7 papers receiving 451 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 54
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 142
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 81
- Aging 6
- Plant Science 125
Countries citing papers authored by Ruth M. Fischer
This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth M. Fischer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth M. Fischer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth M. Fischer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth M. Fischer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth M. Fischer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth M. Fischer. The network helps show where Ruth M. Fischer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ruth M. Fischer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2021 | 11 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 164 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 58 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 12 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 71 | |
| 6 | 1994 | 124 | |
| 7 | 1989 | 24 |
About Ruth M. Fischer
Ruth M. Fischer is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cell Biology, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Molecular Biology and Plant Science, having authored 7 papers that have together received 464 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Development and Disorders (3 papers), Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications (3 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (2 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (2 papers), Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance (1 paper), Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity (1 paper), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (1 paper) and Plant Molecular Biology Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (54 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (142 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (81 citations), Aging (6 citations) and Plant Science (125 citations). Ruth M. Fischer has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Kristin Tessmar‐Raible, Klaus Apel, Dorothee Staiger, Christian Heintzen, Stefan Kappeler, Siegbert Melzer, Maximilian Hofbauer, Peter G. Higgins, Wulf Haubensak and John R. Stowers. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS Biology, Nature Methods, Planta, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.