Ruth E. Mitchell
Impact in
- Biological Psychiatry top 5%
- Tryptophan and brain disorders
- Dermatology top 2%
- Skin Protection and Aging
Papers in ⓘ
- Co-authors
- George Davey Smith (14 shared papers)Nicholas J. Timpson (14 shared papers)Adil Harroud (8 shared papers)J. Brent Richards (8 shared papers)Tom Dudding (3 shared papers)Vincenzo Forgetta (6 shared papers)Lavinia Paternoster (6 shared papers)Despoina Manousaki (5 shared papers)
- Journals
- Scientific Reports (4 papers)Australasian Journal of Dermatology (4 papers)PLoS Medicine (3 papers)American Journal of Physical Anthropology (2 papers)Neurology (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Ruth E. Mitchell
49 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
- Biological Psychiatry 75
- Dermatology 180
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 268
- Genetics 413
- Behavioral Neuroscience 44
Countries citing papers authored by Ruth E. Mitchell
This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth E. Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth E. Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth E. Mitchell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth E. Mitchell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth E. Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth E. Mitchell. The network helps show where Ruth E. Mitchell may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ruth E. Mitchell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 176 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 145 | |
| 3 | 1967 | 141 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 88 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 70 | |
| 6 | 2023 | 69 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 64 | |
| 8 | 2012 | 57 | |
| 9 | 1963 | 52 | |
| 10 | 1991 | 42 | |
| 11 | 2019 | 36 | |
| 12 | 2023 | 35 | |
| 13 | 2021 | 33 | |
| 14 | 2021 | 31 | |
| 15 | 1968 | 27 | |
| 16 | 2019 | 25 | |
| 17 | 1975 | 20 | |
| 18 | 2019 | 20 | |
| 19 | 2021 | 19 | |
| 20 | 1971 | 15 |
About Ruth E. Mitchell
Ruth E. Mitchell is a scholar working on Biological Psychiatry, Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Dermatology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Genetics, having authored 52 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (11 papers), Skin Protection and Aging (5 papers), Vitamin D Research Studies (5 papers), Immune Cell Function and Interaction (4 papers), Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (4 papers), Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease (4 papers), Malaria Research and Control (3 papers) and Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (75 citations), Dermatology (180 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (268 citations), Genetics (413 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (44 citations). Ruth E. Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include George Davey Smith, Nicholas J. Timpson, Adil Harroud, J. Brent Richards, Tom Dudding, Vincenzo Forgetta, Lavinia Paternoster, Despoina Manousaki, Simon Haworth and Gibran Hemani. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, Australasian Journal of Dermatology, PLoS Medicine, American Journal of Physical Anthropology and Neurology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.