Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Preventing stroke: saving lives around the world
20071.1k citationsKathleen Strong, Ruth Bonita et al.profile →
Recovery of motor function after stroke.
19881.1k citationsRuth Bonita, Robert BeagleholeStrokeprofile →
NCD Countdown 2030: worldwide trends in non-communicable disease mortality and progress towards Sustainable Development Goal target 3.4
2018816 citationsRuth Bonita et al.The Lancetprofile →
This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Bonita's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Bonita with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Bonita more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Bonita. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Bonita. The network helps show where Ruth Bonita may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ruth Bonita
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ruth Bonita.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ruth Bonita based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Ruth Bonita. Ruth Bonita is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Tesfaye, Fikru, Peter Byass, Stig Wall, Yemane Berhane, & Ruth Bonita. (2008). Association of smoking and khat (Catha edulis Forsk) use with high blood pressure among adults in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2006.. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 5(3). A89–A89.90 indexed citations
Beaglehole, Robert & Ruth Bonita. (2004). Public health at the cross roads : achievements and prospects. DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library).
Bonita, Ruth. (1996). Women, aging and health : achieving health across the life span. World Health Organization eBooks.2 indexed citations
11.
Bonita, Ruth & A Howe. (1996). Older women in an aging world: achieving health across the life course.. PubMed. 49(2). 134–41.10 indexed citations
12.
Broad, Joanna, et al.. (1996). Changes in the long-term care of older people in Auckland between 1988 and 1993.. PubMed. 47(6). 19–19.6 indexed citations
13.
Beaglehole, Robert, Ruth Bonita, & Tord Kjellström. (1994). Basic epidemiology : teacher's guide. World Health Organization eBooks.1 indexed citations
14.
Bonita, Ruth, Robert Beaglehole, & Kjell Asplund. (1994). The worldwide problem of stroke. Current Opinion in Neurology. 7(1). 5–10.25 indexed citations
15.
Bonita, Ruth, et al.. (1991). Functional disability in residents of Auckland rest homes.. ResearchSpace (University of Auckland). 104(912). 200–2.2 indexed citations
16.
Bonita, Ruth, et al.. (1991). The extent of cervical screening in New Zealand women.. PubMed. 104(918). 349–52.6 indexed citations
17.
Bonita, Ruth, et al.. (1990). A profile of the 7500 people in aged-care institutions in Auckland.. PubMed. 103(902). 553–5.9 indexed citations
18.
Bonita, Ruth. (1988). Rehabilitation services received by stroke patients: the Auckland stroke study.. PubMed. 101(854). 595–7.2 indexed citations
Beaglehole, Robert, et al.. (1986). Cardiovascular mortality in New Zealand and Australia 1968-1983: how can the diverging trends be explained?. PubMed. 99(794). 1–3.5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.