Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Major depression in stroke patients. A 3-year longitudinal study.
1993552 citationsMaria Åström, Rolf Adolfsson et al.Strokeprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Kjell Asplund's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kjell Asplund with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kjell Asplund more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kjell Asplund. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kjell Asplund. The network helps show where Kjell Asplund may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kjell Asplund
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kjell Asplund.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kjell Asplund based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Kjell Asplund. Kjell Asplund is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Eriksson, Marie, Eva‐Lotta Glader, Bo Norrving, & Kjell Asplund. (2015). Post-stroke suicide attempts and completed suicides : A socioeconomic and nationwide perspective. International Journal of Stroke. 10. 33–33.2 indexed citations
Ramsay, Karin Wilbe, Charles Hanson, & Kjell Asplund. (2014). [Mitochondrial replacement--potential therapy method with ethical implications. Severe disease may be prevented, but knowledge gaps exist].. PubMed. 111(29-31). 1240–3.1 indexed citations
4.
Glader, Eva‐Lotta, et al.. (2013). More equal stroke unit care over time. A 15-year follow up of socioeconomic disparities in stroke unit care in Sweden. Cerebrovascular Diseases. 35. 702–702.1 indexed citations
5.
Sahlin, Nils‐Eric, Kjell Asplund, Maaret Castrén, et al.. (2010). Triage och flödesprocesser på akutmottagningen : En systematisk litteraturöversikt. Lund University Publications (Lund University).7 indexed citations
6.
Britton, M, Kjell Asplund, Bengt Brorsson, et al.. (2002). [How the SBU influenced clinical practice. Consequences of seven reports scrutinized].. PubMed. 99(46). 4628–4.2 indexed citations
Stegmayr, Birgitta, Kjell Asplund, Kerstin Hulter‐Åsberg, et al.. (1999). [Stroke unit care saves lives. The Swedish national quality assessment registry of stroke care is the first of its kind in the world].. PubMed. 96(22). 2719–24, 2726.1 indexed citations
Bonita, Ruth, Robert Beaglehole, & Kjell Asplund. (1994). The worldwide problem of stroke. Current Opinion in Neurology. 7(1). 5–10.25 indexed citations
Axelsson, Karin, Astrid Norberg, & Kjell Asplund. (1984). En modell för analys av ätproblem : tillämpad på patienter med cerebrovaskulär sjukdom på sjukhus. 61. 350–355.3 indexed citations
Asplund, Kjell. (1977). [Hypothalamus and obesity].. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich). 74(38). 3179–82.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.