Ruth Amos
Impact in
- Spectroscopy top 1%
- Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography
- Analytical Chemistry top 1%
- Chromatography in Natural Products
Papers in
- Spectroscopy 18
- Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography 17
-
- Computational Drug Discovery Methods 11
- Co-authors
- Paul R. Haddad (15 shared papers)Roman Szücs (15 shared papers)Christopher A. Pohl (15 shared papers)John W. Dolan (15 shared papers)Mohammad Talebi (14 shared papers)Maryam Taraji (7 shared papers)Jason A. Smith (6 shared papers)Devin Rogers (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Chromatography A (20 papers)Tetrahedron (3 papers)Analytical Chemistry (2 papers)Journal of Biological Education (2 papers)Electrophoresis (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Ruth Amos
49 papers receiving 1.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 149
- Spectroscopy 742
- Analytical Chemistry 339
- Genetics 245
- Hematology 214
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 236
Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Amos
This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Amos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Amos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Amos more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth Amos
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Amos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Amos. The network helps show where Ruth Amos may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ruth Amos, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2007 | 253 | |
| 2 | 1975 | 220 | |
| 3 | 1977 | 155 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 97 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 81 | |
| 6 | 1975 | 61 | |
| 7 | 1977 | 60 | |
| 8 | 1976 | 60 | |
| 9 | 1979 | 57 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 54 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 52 | |
| 12 | 2005 | 51 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 47 | |
| 14 | 2016 | 47 | |
| 15 | 2017 | 40 | |
| 16 | 2008 | 40 | |
| 17 | 2018 | 39 | |
| 18 | 2016 | 33 | |
| 19 | 2014 | 33 | |
| 20 | 1981 | 32 |
About Ruth Amos
Ruth Amos is a scholar working on Spectroscopy, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Analytical Chemistry, Materials Chemistry and Molecular Biology, having authored 51 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (17 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (11 papers), Chromatography in Natural Products (8 papers), Crystallization and Solubility Studies (4 papers), Carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis (3 papers), Radical Photochemical Reactions (3 papers), Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research (3 papers) and Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Spectroscopy (742 citations), Analytical Chemistry (339 citations), Genetics (245 citations), Hematology (214 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (236 citations). Ruth Amos has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Paul R. Haddad, Roman Szücs, Christopher A. Pohl, John W. Dolan, Mohammad Talebi, Maryam Taraji, Jason A. Smith, Devin Rogers, H. Newell and Stephen Evans. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Chromatography A, Tetrahedron, Analytical Chemistry, Journal of Biological Education and Electrophoresis.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.