Royal Law
About
In The Last Decade
Royal Law
40 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref
| Name | h | Career | Trend | Papers | Cites | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Royal Law United States | 15 | 443 | 267 | 176 | 152 | 146 | 42 | 1.3k | ||
| Marcel J. Casavant United States | 22 | 429 1.0× | 575 2.2× | 347 2.0× | 106 0.7× | 190 1.3× | 79 | 1.9k | ||
| Christopher P. Holstege United States | 26 | 260 0.6× | 571 2.1× | 138 0.8× | 128 0.8× | 187 1.3× | 108 | 2.0k | ||
| David Reith New Zealand | 25 | 329 0.7× | 362 1.4× | 241 1.4× | 253 1.7× | 255 1.7× | 124 | 2.0k | ||
| B. Zane Horowitz United States | 25 | 189 0.4× | 446 1.7× | 153 0.9× | 122 0.8× | 251 1.7× | 98 | 1.7k | ||
| Robert G. Hendrickson United States | 24 | 158 0.4× | 471 1.8× | 188 1.1× | 172 1.1× | 325 2.2× | 117 | 1.6k | ||
| John Paul Thompson United Kingdom | 20 | 212 0.5× | 380 1.4× | 87 0.5× | 136 0.9× | 151 1.0× | 65 | 1.1k | ||
| Steven B. Bird United States | 22 | 177 0.4× | 260 1.0× | 211 1.2× | 75 0.5× | 272 1.9× | 60 | 1.7k | ||
| Jeanna M. Marraffa United States | 17 | 117 0.3× | 352 1.3× | 139 0.8× | 230 1.5× | 192 1.3× | 40 | 1.1k | ||
| Josh Schier United States | 10 | 105 0.2× | 224 0.8× | 92 0.5× | 140 0.9× | 221 1.5× | 15 | 1.0k | ||
| Jennifer L. Pilgrim Australia | 20 | 181 0.4× | 176 0.7× | 339 1.9× | 40 0.3× | 154 1.1× | 38 | 903 |
Countries citing papers authored by Royal Law
This map shows the geographic impact of Royal Law's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Royal Law with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Royal Law more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Royal Law
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Royal Law. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Royal Law. The network helps show where Royal Law may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Royal Law
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Royal Law. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Royal Law based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Royal Law. Royal Law is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.