Roy K. Gibson

1.7k total citations
21 papers, 165 citations indexed

About

Roy K. Gibson is a scholar working on Anthropology, Organic Chemistry and Philosophy. According to data from OpenAlex, Roy K. Gibson has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 165 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Anthropology, 10 papers in Organic Chemistry and 5 papers in Philosophy. Recurrent topics in Roy K. Gibson's work include Classical Antiquity Studies (18 papers), Organic Chemistry Synthesis Methods (10 papers) and Classical Philosophy and Thought (3 papers). Roy K. Gibson is often cited by papers focused on Classical Antiquity Studies (18 papers), Organic Chemistry Synthesis Methods (10 papers) and Classical Philosophy and Thought (3 papers). Roy K. Gibson collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and Norway. Roy K. Gibson's co-authors include Ruth Morello, Alison Sharrock, Niklas Holzberg, Christopher Whitton, Stephen Harrison, Alison Keith, Laurel Fulkerson, Thea S. Thorsen, Megan O. Drinkwater and Richard Hunter and has published in prestigious journals such as The Classical World, The Journal of Roman Studies and The Classical Quarterly.

In The Last Decade

Roy K. Gibson

17 papers receiving 110 citations

Peers

Roy K. Gibson
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
  • Anthropology 129
  • Archeology 52
  • Classics 43
  • Organic Chemistry 39
  • Philosophy 33
Replace Robert Maltby with:
Robert Maltby United Kingdom
Cynthia Damon United States
Martha Malamud United States
Anton Powell United Kingdom
William J. Dominik United States
Andrew Feldherr United States
Christina S. Kraus United States
Marilyn B. Skinner United States
Ellen Greene United States
Victoria Rimell Italy
Robert Maltby United Kingdom View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Roy K. Gibson
Roy K. Gibson · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Roy K. Gibson
Roy K. Gibson · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Roy K. Gibson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Roy K. Gibson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Roy K. Gibson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Roy K. Gibson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Roy K. Gibson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Roy K. Gibson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Roy K. Gibson. The network helps show where Roy K. Gibson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Roy K. Gibson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Roy K. Gibson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Roy K. Gibson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Roy K. Gibson. Roy K. Gibson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 5
2 2
3 1
4
Oxford Readings in Classical Studies: the Epistles of Pliny
2
5 1
6 8
7 23
8 22
9 17
10 18
11
The success and failure of Roman love elegy as an instrument of subversion: the case of Propertius
2
12
Excess and Restraint: Propertius, Horace and Ovid's 'Ars Amatoria'
14
13 8
14
Ovid's Art of Love
1
15 2
16 2
17 17
18 2
19 4
20 7

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026