Roy Halliday

1.2k total citations
29 papers, 1.0k citations indexed

About

Roy Halliday is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Roy Halliday has authored 29 papers receiving a total of 1.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 6 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health and 4 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Roy Halliday's work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (10 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (7 papers) and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (6 papers). Roy Halliday is often cited by papers focused on Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (10 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (7 papers) and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (6 papers). Roy Halliday collaborates with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Australia. Roy Halliday's co-authors include Enoch Callaway, Hilary Naylor, Karen Herzig, Daniel Brandeis, Neal L. Benowitz, Jacques Le Houezec, Phillip S. Gardiner, Thomas J. Coates, Walter W. Hauck and Eliseo J. Pérez‐Stable and has published in prestigious journals such as Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, The American Journal of Medicine and Neuropsychopharmacology.

In The Last Decade

Roy Halliday

29 papers receiving 951 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Roy Halliday United States 18 676 221 167 129 125 29 1.0k
Hilary Naylor United States 15 535 0.8× 137 0.6× 152 0.9× 111 0.9× 105 0.8× 20 822
Anthony J. Rissling United States 17 969 1.4× 342 1.5× 126 0.8× 184 1.4× 176 1.4× 19 1.3k
June M. Stapleton United States 23 989 1.5× 202 0.9× 321 1.9× 185 1.4× 648 5.2× 38 1.8k
Monte S. Buchsbaum United States 9 555 0.8× 197 0.9× 59 0.4× 146 1.1× 146 1.2× 9 983
Jennifer Holmes United States 5 1.1k 1.6× 386 1.7× 57 0.3× 214 1.7× 209 1.7× 7 1.5k
Natraj Sitaram United States 15 342 0.5× 209 0.9× 100 0.6× 133 1.0× 111 0.9× 24 632
Matthew Hughes Australia 23 775 1.1× 303 1.4× 81 0.5× 221 1.7× 102 0.8× 57 1.4k
S. Johannes Germany 10 1.1k 1.6× 122 0.6× 74 0.4× 219 1.7× 69 0.6× 17 1.4k
Jeffrey N. Valdez United States 17 782 1.2× 381 1.7× 97 0.6× 262 2.0× 150 1.2× 25 1.5k
John J. Straumanis United States 20 597 0.9× 264 1.2× 31 0.2× 126 1.0× 180 1.4× 38 959

Countries citing papers authored by Roy Halliday

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Roy Halliday's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Roy Halliday with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Roy Halliday more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Roy Halliday

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Roy Halliday. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Roy Halliday. The network helps show where Roy Halliday may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Roy Halliday

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Roy Halliday. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Roy Halliday based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Roy Halliday. Roy Halliday is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Pérez‐Stable, Eliseo J., Roy Halliday, Phillip S. Gardiner, et al.. (2000). The effects of propranolol on cognitive function and quality of life: a randomized trial among patients with diastolic hypertension. The American Journal of Medicine. 108(5). 359–365. 63 indexed citations
2.
Herzig, Karen, Enoch Callaway, Roy Halliday, Hilary Naylor, & Neal L. Benowitz. (1998). Effects of cotinine on information processing in nonsmokers. Psychopharmacology. 135(2). 127–132. 26 indexed citations
3.
Houezec, Jacques Le, Roy Halliday, Neal L. Benowitz, et al.. (1994). A low dose of subcutaneous nicotine improves information processing in non-smokers. Psychopharmacology. 114(4). 628–634. 111 indexed citations
4.
Halliday, Roy, et al.. (1994). The effect of D‐amphetamine, clonidine, and yohimbine on human information processing. Psychophysiology. 31(4). 331–337. 60 indexed citations
5.
Callaway, Enoch, et al.. (1994). Drugs and Human Information Processing. Neuropsychopharmacology. 10(1). 9–19. 20 indexed citations
6.
Callaway, Enoch, Roy Halliday, & Hilary Naylor. (1992). Cholinergic activity and constraints on information processing. Biological Psychology. 33(1). 1–22. 49 indexed citations
7.
Pérez‐Stable, Eliseo J., Thomas J. Coates, Roy Halliday, Phillip S. Gardiner, & Walter W. Hauck. (1992). The effects of mild diastolic hypertension on the results of tests of cognitive function in adults 22 to 59 years of age. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 7(1). 19–25. 11 indexed citations
8.
Brandeis, Daniel, et al.. (1992). Scopolamine Effects on Visual Information Processing, Attention, and Event‐Related Potential Map Latencies. Psychophysiology. 29(3). 315–335. 116 indexed citations
9.
Callaway, Enoch, Roy Halliday, Hilary Naylor, & Daniel Brandeis. (1991). Clonidine and scopolamine: Differences and similarities in how they change human information processing. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry. 15(4). 497–502. 14 indexed citations
11.
Halliday, Roy, et al.. (1989). The effects of clonidine and yohimbine on human information processing. Psychopharmacology. 99(4). 563–566. 23 indexed citations
12.
Halliday, Roy, et al.. (1987). What's done can't always be undone: the effects of stimulant drugs and dopamine blockers on information processing.. PubMed. 40. 532–7. 12 indexed citations
13.
Walton, P, Enoch Callaway, Roy Halliday, & Hilary Naylor. (1987). Stimulus intensity, contrast, and complexity have additive effects on P300 latency.. PubMed. 40. 284–92. 6 indexed citations
14.
Callaway, Enoch, et al.. (1985). Effects of oral scopolamine on human stimulus evaluation. Psychopharmacology. 85(2). 133–138. 83 indexed citations
15.
Naylor, Hilary, Roy Halliday, & Enoch Callaway. (1985). The effect of methylphenidate on information processing. Psychopharmacology. 86(1-2). 90–95. 46 indexed citations
16.
Halliday, Roy, et al.. (1984). Age, Stimulant Drug, and Practice Effects on P3 Latency and Concurrent Reaction Timea. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 425(1). 357–361. 5 indexed citations
17.
Otto, David A., Rathe Karrer, Roy Halliday, et al.. (1984). Developmental Aspects of Event‐Related Potentials. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 425(1). 319–337. 7 indexed citations
18.
Callaway, Enoch, Roy Halliday, Shirley C. Peeke, & Victor I. Reus. (1982). How does methylphenidate (MP) affect information processing in man?. PubMed. 18(4). 205–6. 1 indexed citations
19.
Halliday, Roy & Enoch Callaway. (1978). Time shipt evoked potentials (TSEPs): Method and basic results. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. 45(1). 118–121. 32 indexed citations
20.
Reynierse, James H., et al.. (1968). Nonassociative factors inhibiting earthworm straight-alley performance.. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology. 65(1). 160–163. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026