Rosemary Warren

544 total citations
12 papers, 382 citations indexed

About

Rosemary Warren is a scholar working on Oncology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Rosemary Warren has authored 12 papers receiving a total of 382 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Oncology, 3 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine and 3 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. Recurrent topics in Rosemary Warren's work include BRCA gene mutations in cancer (3 papers), Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (3 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (3 papers). Rosemary Warren is often cited by papers focused on BRCA gene mutations in cancer (3 papers), Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (3 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (3 papers). Rosemary Warren collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Canada. Rosemary Warren's co-authors include Jane Halliday, Pranee Liamputtong Rice, V. Collins, Rhonda Small, Jane Yelland, R. Williamson, Lyndsey F. Watson, Robin J. Bell, Judith Lumley and Robert Williamson and has published in prestigious journals such as British Journal of Cancer, Clinical Genetics and Prenatal Diagnosis.

In The Last Decade

Rosemary Warren

11 papers receiving 351 citations

Peers

Rosemary Warren

GENET

PPCH

PHEOH

PFM

SPS

Teresa Doksum United States

Zohreh Khakbazan Iran

Lea Hagoel Israel

Caren J. Frost United States

Jennifer Bell Canada

Mahboob Sobhan United States

Lauren Humphreys Canada

Catherine Wicklund United States

Aloísio José Bedone Brazil

Ceri Phelps United Kingdom

Teresa Doksum United States

Rosemary Warren

244 ×1.6

GENET

105 ×1.0

PPCH

121 ×1.6

PHEOH

33 ×0.4

PFM

62 ×0.8

SPS

Citations per year, relative to Rosemary Warren Rosemary Warren (= 1×) peers Teresa Doksum

Countries citing papers authored by Rosemary Warren

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rosemary Warren's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rosemary Warren with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rosemary Warren more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rosemary Warren

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rosemary Warren. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rosemary Warren. The network helps show where Rosemary Warren may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rosemary Warren

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rosemary Warren. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rosemary Warren based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rosemary Warren. Rosemary Warren is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

12 of 12 papers shown

Greig, Paul, et al.. (2019). Taming ‘biggish’ data. BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning. 5(4). 194–195. 1 indexed citations

Warren, Rosemary, et al.. (2019). O21 Real learning in a virtual emergency: comparing teaching methods for medical students. Oral Presentations. A12.1–A12. 3 indexed citations

Meiser, Bettina, V. Collins, Rosemary Warren, et al.. (2004). Psychological impact of genetic testing for hereditary non‐polyposis colorectal cancer. Clinical Genetics. 66(6). 502–511. 66 indexed citations

Liamputtong, Pranee, Jane Halliday, Rosemary Warren, Lyndsey F. Watson, & Robin J. Bell. (2003). Why Do Women Decline Prenatal Screening and Diagnosis? Australian Women's Perspective. Women & Health. 37(2). 89–108. 29 indexed citations

Halliday, Jane, Rosemary Warren, Geraldine McDonald, et al.. (2001). Prenatal diagnosis for women aged 37 years and over: to have or not to have. Prenatal Diagnosis. 21(10). 842–847. 37 indexed citations

Collins, V., Jane Halliday, Rosemary Warren, & R. Williamson. (2000). Cancer worries, risk perceptions and associations with interest in DNA testing and clinic satisfaction in a familial colorectal cancer clinic. Clinical Genetics. 58(6). 460–468. 59 indexed citations

Collins, Veronica, Jane Halliday, Rosemary Warren, & Robert Williamson. (2000). Assessment of education and counselling offered by a familial colorectal cancer clinic. Clinical Genetics. 57(1). 48–55. 38 indexed citations

Small, Rhonda, et al.. (1999). Cross-cultural research: trying to do it better 2. Enhancing data quality. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health. 23(4). 390–395. 50 indexed citations

Warren, Rosemary, et al.. (1998). Psychological predictors of attendance at annual breast screening examinations. British Journal of Cancer. 77(11). 2014–2019. 33 indexed citations

10.

Yelland, Jane, et al.. (1998). Support, sensitivity, satisfaction: Filipino, Turkish and Vietnamese women's experiences of postnatal hospital stay. Midwifery. 14(3). 144–154. 60 indexed citations

11.

Thompson, Sandra, et al.. (1997). Risk factors associated with hepatocellular carcinoma notified to the Anti-Cancer Council of Victoria in 1991-1992. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health. 21(6). 626–630. 5 indexed citations

12.

Thompson, Sandra, et al.. (1977). Risk factors associated with hepatocellular carcinoma notified to the Anti–Cancer Council of Victoria in 1991–1992. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health. 21(6). 626–630. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact