Rosemary T. Smith
- Pharmacology top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Co-authors
- Staci A. GruberMary Kathryn DahlgrenKelly A. SagarAshley M. LambrosScott E. LukasMegan T. RacineA. GönençBrent P. Forester
- Topics
- Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (17 papers)Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects (4 papers)Sleep and related disorders (3 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaScientific ReportsBiological Psychiatry
- Partner nations
- United StatesFranceGermany
In The Last Decade
Rosemary T. Smith
19 papers receiving 308 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Pharmacology 269
- Cognitive Neuroscience 66
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 59
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 53
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 46
Countries citing papers authored by Rosemary T. Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Rosemary T. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rosemary T. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rosemary T. Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Rosemary T. Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rosemary T. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rosemary T. Smith. The network helps show where Rosemary T. Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rosemary T. Smith
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rosemary T. Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rosemary T. Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rosemary T. Smith. Rosemary T. Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | 27 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 29 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 13 | |
| 9 | 25 | |
| 10 | 23 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 42 | |
| 16 | 47 | |
| 17 | 18 | |
| 18 | 57 | |
| 19 | 1 |
About Rosemary T. Smith
Rosemary T. Smith is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Toxicology and Business and International Management, having authored 19 papers that have together received 314 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (17 papers), Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects (4 papers) and Sleep and related disorders (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (269 citations), Toxicology (26 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (46 citations). Rosemary T. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Staci A. Gruber, Mary Kathryn Dahlgren, Kelly A. Sagar, Ashley M. Lambros, Scott E. Lukas, Megan T. Racine, A. Gönenç, Brent P. Forester, David G. Harper and Pasquale Calabrese. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Scientific Reports and Biological Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.