Rosemary A. Mardling

3.0k total citations
40 papers, 1.5k citations indexed

About

Rosemary A. Mardling is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, Rosemary A. Mardling has authored 40 papers receiving a total of 1.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 35 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 6 papers in Instrumentation and 4 papers in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics. Recurrent topics in Rosemary A. Mardling's work include Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (28 papers), Astro and Planetary Science (28 papers) and Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (13 papers). Rosemary A. Mardling is often cited by papers focused on Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (28 papers), Astro and Planetary Science (28 papers) and Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (13 papers). Rosemary A. Mardling collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Rosemary A. Mardling's co-authors include S. J. Aarseth, Dacheng Lin, Peter Bodenheimer, D. N. C. Lin, Ian Dobbs‐Dixon, Jean Armstrong, Xiang Li, Penny D. Sackett, D. N. C. Lin and Eric L. Sandquist and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, The Astrophysical Journal and Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

In The Last Decade

Rosemary A. Mardling

40 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Rosemary A. Mardling Australia 17 1.4k 247 77 54 51 40 1.5k
J. D. Hartman United States 24 1.7k 1.2× 628 2.5× 23 0.3× 19 0.4× 51 1.0× 59 1.7k
Arlin Crotts United States 21 1.0k 0.8× 206 0.8× 32 0.4× 31 0.6× 178 3.5× 58 1.1k
G. M. Seabroke United Kingdom 23 1.4k 1.1× 685 2.8× 39 0.5× 62 1.1× 106 2.1× 45 1.5k
C. M. Copperwheat United Kingdom 24 1.6k 1.2× 401 1.6× 14 0.2× 17 0.3× 94 1.8× 82 1.7k
Elisa V. Quintana United States 21 1.2k 0.9× 416 1.7× 18 0.2× 18 0.3× 25 0.5× 51 1.2k
T. D. Oswalt United States 21 1.4k 1.0× 580 2.3× 14 0.2× 22 0.4× 121 2.4× 77 1.4k
M. Guêdel United States 18 885 0.7× 80 0.3× 26 0.3× 7 0.1× 75 1.5× 54 927
L. Molnár Hungary 18 895 0.7× 333 1.3× 6 0.1× 26 0.5× 40 0.8× 85 943
Philip S. Muirhead United States 18 1.5k 1.1× 711 2.9× 35 0.5× 11 0.2× 30 0.6× 66 1.5k
N. Huélamo Spain 23 1.5k 1.1× 369 1.5× 24 0.3× 22 0.4× 24 0.5× 91 1.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Rosemary A. Mardling

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rosemary A. Mardling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rosemary A. Mardling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rosemary A. Mardling more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rosemary A. Mardling

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rosemary A. Mardling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rosemary A. Mardling. The network helps show where Rosemary A. Mardling may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rosemary A. Mardling

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rosemary A. Mardling. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rosemary A. Mardling based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rosemary A. Mardling. Rosemary A. Mardling is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Kouwenhoven, M. B. N., et al.. (2023). Analysis of Kozai cycles in equal-mass hierarchical triple supermassive black hole mergers in the presence of a stellar cluster. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 527(4). 10705–10725. 1 indexed citations
2.
Rein, Hanno, Daniel Tamayo, Sam Hadden, et al.. (2023). Self-consistent Spin, Tidal, and Dynamical Equations of Motion in the REBOUNDx Framework. The Astrophysical Journal. 948(1). 41–41. 17 indexed citations
3.
Mardling, Rosemary A., et al.. (2023). Quadruple-star systems are not always nested triples: a machine learning approach to dynamical stability. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 525(2). 2388–2398. 2 indexed citations
4.
Standing, Matthew R., A. H. M. J. Triaud, J. P. Faria, et al.. (2022). Keele Research Repository (Keele University). 16 indexed citations
5.
Leleu, A., J.-B. Delisle, Rosemary A. Mardling, et al.. (2022). Alleviating the transit timing variation bias in transit surveys. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 661. A141–A141. 3 indexed citations
6.
Leleu, A., J.-B. Delisle, S. Udry, et al.. (2022). Removing biases on the density of sub-Neptunes characterised via transit timing variations. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 669. A117–A117. 8 indexed citations
7.
Hamers, Adrian S., et al.. (2022). Algebraic and machine learning approach to hierarchical triple-star stability. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 516(3). 4146–4155. 23 indexed citations
8.
Batygin, Konstantin, Rosemary A. Mardling, & David Nesvorný. (2021). The Stability Boundary of the Distant Scattered Disk. The Astrophysical Journal. 920(2). 148–148. 16 indexed citations
9.
Leleu, A., et al.. (2021). Alleviating the transit timing variation bias in transit surveys. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 655. A66–A66. 12 indexed citations
10.
Almenara, J. M., R. F. Díaz, Rosemary A. Mardling, et al.. (2015). Absolute masses and radii determination in multiplanetary systems without stellar models. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 453(3). 2645–2653. 10 indexed citations
11.
Mardling, Rosemary A.. (2010). Tidal evolution of star-planet systems. Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union. 6(S276). 238–242. 1 indexed citations
12.
Mardling, Rosemary A.. (2010). The determination of planetary structure in tidally relaxed inclined systems. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 407(2). 1048–1069. 38 indexed citations
13.
Aarseth, S. J., et al.. (2008). The Cambridge N-Body Lectures. Lecture notes in physics. 80 indexed citations
14.
Li, Xiang, Rosemary A. Mardling, & Jean Armstrong. (2007). Channel Capacity of IM/DD Optical Communication Systems and of ACO-OFDM. 2128–2133. 75 indexed citations
15.
Johnston‐Hollitt, M., et al.. (2005). New Horizons - A Decadal Plan for Australian Astronomy 2006-2015. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 3 indexed citations
16.
Regős, Enikő, et al.. (2005). Mass transfer in eccentric binary stars. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 358(2). 544–550. 25 indexed citations
17.
Maloney, F. P., et al.. (2003). Revisiting the Anomalous Apsidal Motion of the Eccentric Eclipsing Binary DI Herculis. American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts. 203. 1 indexed citations
18.
Sandquist, Eric L., et al.. (2002). A Critical Examination of Li Pollution and Giant Planet Consumption by a Host Star. 38 indexed citations
19.
Mardling, Rosemary A.. (2001). Stability in the general three-body problem. Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford). 229. 101–116. 3 indexed citations
20.
Mardling, Rosemary A. & S. J. Aarseth. (2001). Tidal interactions in star cluster simulations. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 321(3). 398–420. 315 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026