Rose E. O’Dea

3.5k citations

30 papers · 2.0k indexed · 4 hit papers · h-index 19

Impact in

Ecological Modeling top 2%
- Species Distribution and Climate Change
Nature and Landscape Conservation top 5%
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Fish Ecology and Management Studies

Papers in ⓘ

Ecological Modeling 10
- Species Distribution and Climate Change 10
Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 7
- scientometrics and bibliometrics research 4
- Meta-analysis and systematic reviews 4

Co-authors: Shinichi Nakagawa (23 shared papers)Malgorzata Lagisz (18 shared papers)Daniel W. A. Noble (16 shared papers)Michael D. Jennions (9 shared papers)Julia Koricheva (6 shared papers)Timothy Parker (5 shared papers)Yefeng Yang (4 shared papers)Alfredo Sánchez‐Tójar (4 shared papers)
Journals: Methods in Ecology and Evolution (4 papers)BMC Biology (3 papers)Ecology and Evolution (3 papers)Journal of Experimental Biology (2 papers)Journal of Evolutionary Biology (2 papers)
Partner nations: Australia United Kingdom Germany

In The Last Decade

Rose E. O’Dea

29 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories log scale

orchaRd 2.0: An R package for visualising meta‐analyses with orchard plots 2023 · 74 citations

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if any of the following hold:

it has ≥500 total citations;
it reaches ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (the threshold is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it);
it reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

2023 Methods in Ecology and Evolution
2021 Methods in Ecology and Evolution
2021 Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society
2020 Research Synthesis Methods

Peers

Countries citing papers authored by Rose E. O’Dea

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rose E. O’Dea's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rose E. O’Dea with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rose E. O’Dea more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rose E. O’Dea

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rose E. O’Dea. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rose E. O’Dea. The network helps show where Rose E. O’Dea may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Rose E. O’Dea, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Rose E. O’Dea Line = papers co-authored together Rose E. O’Dea links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#	Work
1	Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society ·Rose E. O’Dea, Malgorzata Lagisz, Michael D. Jennions, Julia Koricheva, Daniel W. A. Noble, Timothy Parker, Jessica Gurevitch, Matthew J. Page, Gavin Stewart, David Moher, Shinichi Nakagawa Hit paper breakdown →	2021	384
2	Methods for testing publication bias in ecological and evolutionary meta‐analyses Methods in Ecology and Evolution ·Shinichi Nakagawa, Malgorzata Lagisz, Michael D. Jennions, Julia Koricheva, Daniel W. A. Noble, Timothy Parker, Alfredo Sánchez‐Tójar, Yefeng Yang, Rose E. O’Dea Hit paper breakdown →	2021	247
3	Nonindependence and sensitivity analyses in ecological and evolutionary meta‐analyses Molecular Ecology ·Daniel W. A. Noble, Malgorzata Lagisz, Rose E. O’Dea, Shinichi Nakagawa	2017	190
4	Research Weaving: Visualizing the Future of Research Synthesis Trends in Ecology & Evolution ·Shinichi Nakagawa, Gihan Samarasinghe, Neal Haddaway, Martin J. Westgate, Rose E. O’Dea, Daniel W. A. Noble, Malgorzata Lagisz	2018	176
5	The orchard plot: Cultivating a forest plot for use in ecology, evolution, and beyond Research Synthesis Methods ·Shinichi Nakagawa, Malgorzata Lagisz, Rose E. O’Dea, Joanna Rutkowska, Yefeng Yang, Daniel W. A. Noble, Alistair M. Senior Hit paper breakdown →	2020	165
6	Gender differences in individual variation in academic grades fail to fit expected patterns for STEM Nature Communications ·Rose E. O’Dea, Malgorzata Lagisz, Michael D. Jennions, Shinichi Nakagawa	2018	123
7	The role of non-genetic inheritance in evolutionary rescue: epigenetic buffering, heritable bet hedging and epigenetic traps Current Zoology ·Rose E. O’Dea, Daniel W. A. Noble, Sheri L. Johnson, Daniel Hesselson, Shinichi Nakagawa	2016	101
8	A practical guide to question formation, systematic searching and study screening for literature reviews in ecology and evolution Methods in Ecology and Evolution ·Yong Zhi Foo, Rose E. O’Dea, Julia Koricheva, Shinichi Nakagawa, Malgorzata Lagisz	2021	100
9	orchaRd 2.0: An R package for visualising meta‐analyses with orchard plots Methods in Ecology and Evolution ·Shinichi Nakagawa, Malgorzata Lagisz, Rose E. O’Dea, Patrice Pottier, Joanna Rutkowska, Alistair M. Senior, Yefeng Yang, Daniel W. A. Noble Hit paper breakdown →	2023	74
10	Unifying individual differences in personality, predictability and plasticity: A practical guide Methods in Ecology and Evolution ·Rose E. O’Dea, Daniel W. A. Noble, Shinichi Nakagawa	2021	56
11	Male body size and condition affects sperm number and production rates in mosquitofish, Gambusia holbrooki Journal of Evolutionary Biology ·Rose E. O’Dea, Michael D. Jennions, Megan L. Head	2014	56
12	Developmental temperature affects phenotypic means and variability: A meta‐analysis of fish data Fish and Fisheries ·Rose E. O’Dea, Malgorzata Lagisz, Andrew P. Hendry, Shinichi Nakagawa	2019	48
13	Closing the knowledge‐action gap in conservation with open science Conservation Biology ·Dominique G. Roche, Rose E. O’Dea, Kecia A. Kerr, Trina Rytwinski, Richard Schuster, Vivian M. Nguyen, Nathan Young, Joseph Bennett, Steven J. Cooke	2021	47
14	Publication bias impacts on effect size, statistical power, and magnitude (Type M) and sign (Type S) errors in ecology and evolutionary biology BMC Biology ·Yefeng Yang, Alfredo Sánchez‐Tójar, Rose E. O’Dea, Daniel W. A. Noble, Julia Koricheva, Michael D. Jennions, Timothy Parker, Malgorzata Lagisz, Shinichi Nakagawa	2023	34
15	Improving quantitative synthesis to achieve generality in ecology Nature Ecology & Evolution ·Rebecca Spake, Rose E. O’Dea, Shinichi Nakagawa, C. Patrick Doncaster, Masahiro Ryo, Corey T. Callaghan, James M. Bullock	2022	32
16	Divide and conquer? Size adjustment with allometry and intermediate outcomes BMC Biology ·Shinichi Nakagawa, Fonti Kar, Rose E. O’Dea, Joel L. Pick, Malgorzata Lagisz	2017	31
17	Illustrating the importance of meta‐analysing variances alongside means in ecology and evolution Journal of Evolutionary Biology ·Alfredo Sánchez‐Tójar, Nicholas P. Moran, Rose E. O’Dea, Klaus Reinhold, Shinichi Nakagawa	2020	30
18	The effects of familiarity and mating experience on mate choice in mosquitofish, Gambusia holbrooki Behavioral Ecology ·Regina Vega‐Trejo, Rose E. O’Dea, Michael D. Jennions, Megan L. Head	2014	23
19	Meta-analytic approaches and effect sizes to account for ‘nuisance heterogeneity’ in comparative physiology Journal of Experimental Biology ·Daniel W. A. Noble, Patrice Pottier, Malgorzata Lagisz, Samantha Burke, Szymon M. Drobniak, Rose E. O’Dea, Shinichi Nakagawa	2022	22
20	The influence of immune challenges on the mean and variance in reproductive investment: a meta-analysis of the terminal investment hypothesis BMC Biology ·Yong Zhi Foo, Malgorzata Lagisz, Rose E. O’Dea, Shinichi Nakagawa	2023	10

About Rose E. O’Dea

Rose E. O’Dea is a scholar working on Ecological Modeling, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Cell Biology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Species Distribution and Climate Change (10 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (9 papers), Plant and animal studies (5 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (5 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (5 papers), scientometrics and bibliometrics research (4 papers), Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications (4 papers) and Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (225 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (382 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (558 citations), Ecology (480 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (314 citations). Rose E. O’Dea has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Shinichi Nakagawa, Malgorzata Lagisz, Daniel W. A. Noble, Michael D. Jennions, Julia Koricheva, Timothy Parker, Yefeng Yang, Alfredo Sánchez‐Tójar, Jessica Gurevitch and David Moher. Their work appears in journals such as Methods in Ecology and Evolution, BMC Biology, Ecology and Evolution, Journal of Experimental Biology and Journal of Evolutionary Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact