Ronit Feingold-Polak

558 total citations
17 papers, 370 citations indexed

About

Ronit Feingold-Polak is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Social Psychology and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, Ronit Feingold-Polak has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 370 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Rehabilitation, 8 papers in Social Psychology and 6 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in Ronit Feingold-Polak's work include Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (10 papers), Social Robot Interaction and HRI (8 papers) and AI in Service Interactions (6 papers). Ronit Feingold-Polak is often cited by papers focused on Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (10 papers), Social Robot Interaction and HRI (8 papers) and AI in Service Interactions (6 papers). Ronit Feingold-Polak collaborates with scholars based in Israel, Germany and Switzerland. Ronit Feingold-Polak's co-authors include Shelly Levy‐Tzedek, Philipp Kellmeyer, Oliver Mueller, Lior Rokach, Boaz Lerner, Yael Edan, Sigal Berman, Amir Shapiro, Yuval Shaḥar and Ilan Kurz and has published in prestigious journals such as Scientific Reports, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews and Frontiers in Neuroscience.

In The Last Decade

Ronit Feingold-Polak

15 papers receiving 366 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Ronit Feingold-Polak Israel	9	177	117	106	61	60	17	370
Nathalia Céspedes Colombia	9	166 0.9×	43 0.4×	116 1.1×	36 0.6×	20 0.3×	14	316
Cristian Ţăpuş United States	6	346 2.0×	42 0.4×	233 2.2×	80 1.3×	62 1.0×	14	507
Mélodie Boulay France	6	182 1.0×	20 0.2×	122 1.2×	49 0.8×	25 0.4×	8	396
G.J. Gelderblom Netherlands	10	95 0.5×	30 0.3×	57 0.5×	91 1.5×	30 0.5×	14	412
Bahar Irfan United Kingdom	10	244 1.4×	28 0.2×	203 1.9×	23 0.4×	36 0.6×	28	389
Luke Wood United Kingdom	11	132 0.7×	18 0.2×	67 0.6×	151 2.5×	26 0.4×	36	454
Giuseppe Palestra Italy	12	138 0.8×	13 0.1×	103 1.0×	124 2.0×	43 0.7×	31	413
Arzu Güneysu Özgür Switzerland	9	71 0.4×	51 0.4×	32 0.3×	101 1.7×	125 2.1×	31	307
Christine Fassert France	3	198 1.1×	9 0.1×	138 1.3×	29 0.5×	29 0.5×	6	310
Maria J. Pinto-Bernal Colombia	8	73 0.4×	32 0.3×	51 0.5×	44 0.7×	8 0.1×	12	245

Countries citing papers authored by Ronit Feingold-Polak

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ronit Feingold-Polak's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ronit Feingold-Polak with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ronit Feingold-Polak more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ronit Feingold-Polak

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ronit Feingold-Polak. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ronit Feingold-Polak. The network helps show where Ronit Feingold-Polak may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ronit Feingold-Polak

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ronit Feingold-Polak. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ronit Feingold-Polak based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ronit Feingold-Polak. Ronit Feingold-Polak is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

17 of 17 papers shown

Feingold-Polak, Ronit, et al.. (2024). Socially Assistive Robot for Stroke Rehabilitation: A Long-Term in-the-Wild Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering. 32. 1616–1626. 7 indexed citations

Feingold-Polak, Ronit, et al.. (2023). Correlation between kinetic and kinematic measures, clinical tests and subjective self-evaluation questionnaires of the affected upper limb in people after stroke. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 17. 1264513–1264513.

Feingold-Polak, Ronit, et al.. (2022). Automating provision of feedback to stroke patients with and without information on compensatory movements: A pilot study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 16. 918804–918804. 6 indexed citations

Feingold-Polak, Ronit, et al.. (2022). Extended Interviews with Stroke Patients Over a Long-Term Rehabilitation Using Human–Robot or Human–Computer Interactions. International Journal of Social Robotics. 14(8). 1893–1911. 15 indexed citations

Feingold-Polak, Ronit, et al.. (2022). Hierarchy in Algorithm-Based Feedback to Patients Working With a Robotic Rehabilitation System: Toward User-Experience Optimization. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems. 52(5). 907–917. 6 indexed citations

Feingold-Polak, Ronit, et al.. (2021). The effects of an object’s height and weight on force calibration and kinematics when post-stroke and healthy individuals reach and grasp. Scientific Reports. 11(1). 20559–20559. 8 indexed citations

Feingold-Polak, Ronit, et al.. (2021). A robot goes to rehab: a novel gamified system for long-term stroke rehabilitation using a socially assistive robot—methodology and usability testing. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation. 18(1). 122–122. 45 indexed citations

Feingold-Polak, Ronit & Shelly Levy‐Tzedek. (2021). Personalized Human Robot Interaction in the Unique Context of Rehabilitation. 126–127. 2 indexed citations

Feingold-Polak, Ronit & Shelly Levy‐Tzedek. (2021). Insights from a Long-Term in-the-Wild Study with Post-Stroke Patients using a Socially Assistive Robot. 319–323. 3 indexed citations

10.

Feingold-Polak, Ronit, et al.. (2020). Social Robot for Rehabilitation. 151–160. 46 indexed citations

11.

Feingold-Polak, Ronit, et al.. (2020). A Machine-Learning Model for Automatic Detection of Movement Compensations in Stroke Patients. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing. 9(3). 1234–1247. 34 indexed citations

12.

Feingold-Polak, Ronit, et al.. (2019). Trust in socially assistive robots: Considerations for use in rehabilitation. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 104. 231–239. 109 indexed citations

13.

Feingold-Polak, Ronit, et al.. (2019). Novel gamified system for post-stroke upper-limb rehabilitation using a social robot: focus groups of expert clinicians. 1–7. 10 indexed citations

14.

Kellmeyer, Philipp, Oliver Mueller, Ronit Feingold-Polak, & Shelly Levy‐Tzedek. (2018). Social robots in rehabilitation: A question of trust. Science Robotics. 3(21). 44 indexed citations

15.

Feingold-Polak, Ronit, et al.. (2018). Differences between young and older users when interacting with a humanoid robot: A qualitative usability study for rehabilitation. Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine. 61. e499–e499.

16.

Feingold-Polak, Ronit, et al.. (2018). Differences between Young and Old Users when Interacting with a Humanoid Robot. 107–108. 9 indexed citations

17.

Feingold-Polak, Ronit, et al.. (2018). Differences between young and old users when interacting with a humanoid robot: a qualitative usability study. Paladyn Journal of Behavioral Robotics. 9(1). 183–192. 26 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact